You canāt ādebunkā Marxism by skimming the Wikipedia page. You canāt expound on your infantile ācritiqueā from a position of total ignorance.
Every time a liberal ādebunksā Marxism it is, without fail, not a single exception, the exact same shit that was discredited 150 years ago. A lot of āMarx didnāt considerās that heās written entire essays on. They canāt come up with literally anything new, spewing the same shit over and over again like a broken record.
Are liberals allergic to academic honesty?
And no I am not German I stole the screenshot.
She used an example of socialism to describe the success of capitalism. The initial penicillin trials were funded by government and charitable sources, not private capital.
thatās not what socialism is
Death to America
thereās a reason why neoliberalism was founded on dismantling the state. The mere possibility for a collective response, such as a state funded enterprise for healthcare (lol Bidenās covid eugenics holocaust) is anathema to their āfree association between individuals navigating the free marketā utopia.
youāre conflating social democracy with socialism
Death to America
Thatās true, but heās still right about the other statements.
Whether intentional or unintentional, assigning a specific definition to a term that lacks a commonly accepted meaning is a conversational obstructionist strategy, a tactic broadly known as āframingā. It is used extensively by politicians to control the narrative around socialism (think red scare, palmer raids, etc). While āsocial democracyā is a positive framing, it still obstruct the original statement. In this case ending up in a semantics debate or attempting to assign a different emotional message. Iām not ragging on you specifically, I just want to point out that this is a thing people do.