• Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Decline in militarism” is russian for ‘make America no longer a super power’. /s

    Clearly a presidential candidate that cares about America in the one realm Presidents hold the most sway: world affairs.

    Putin’s Jizz Stein wants Nato disbanded, the US to give up their SC veto, and revoke weapons to help Ukraine defend itself while simultaneously forcing ‘peace’ (subjugation) negotiations with russia.

    For those that don’t understand how the Electoral College + FPTP voting works, voting for her means helping donald become president due to the spoiler effect.

    2015 Stein breaking bread with Putin, his senior staff, and Mike Flynn (later Trump’s national security advisor

    • I feel AOC is right here. It would be easier to take the Green Party more seriously if they were working hard to build a grassroots and running for and wining elections not only for Senator or House Rep, but even in state legislatures. Perhaps even a governorship or two.

    • Myxomatosis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Nothing to see in this photo. She’s just having a meet and greet over a light lunch with a murderous dictator and a treasonous former general. - Shill Stein Supporters.

        • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Coming back to check how soundly this statement was beaten into oblivion will forever make me smile.

          Wow, so you are happy engaging in namecalling. That says way more about you than it does me.

          If you enjoy making fun of people, then you are definitely in the right place. Enjoy.

          The fact that you enjoy it so much, actually tells me that my guess about you was right. I think you’re the one spreading misinformation and doubt and that maybe you aren’t even voting Democrat. I think I know which side you’re on. Your actions are proving it.

          And you also seem to care way more about upvotes and downvotes than I ever have or will ever do. lol

          I stand by what I said about namecalling. Proudly. :)

          You lost all credibility when you started namecalling. Try disagreeing without namecalling.

          • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            When someone is so reprehensible, being an obvious traitor to her country for a few rubles, is put in their place I do find joy. Some people deserve much worse but insults are the only real recourse.

            I only care about up-votes in this case because it objectively proves you wrong about discrediting which means your predictable burying your head in the sand patently won’t work (Hence your spiral into salty hostility). Sorry friend, but beating your chest and crying “I’m right!” won’t work when it’s prefaced by a big red numeral “f you, you’re wrong”. :)

      • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Tell you what. Let’s make a bet. Whomever has the greater amount of net votes between the 2 posts above by the end of this Sunday vows to stop posting in this community until after the election.

        Edit: We’ll get a mod on the actual server to make the call.

          • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            He followed up with evidence, and you’re crying about name calling, which wasn’t even towards you. Disingenuous as usual.

            • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I didn’t say he called me names. But he called Jill Stein, “Putin’s Jizz Stein.” What “evidence” is there to call her Jizz Stein? That’s name-calling, friend. And uncalled for.

              One can produce “evidence” and an argument, without resorting to name-calling. I stand by what I said. Thank you!

          • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            So by doubling down are you willing to actually stand by it and take the bet? Tell you what. I’m so confident you’re wrong that I’ll give you an hour from the posting of this to craft a full on dissertation on why you think Stein is teh best candidate. You can edit your first reply to that dissertation, I’ll screenshot it and put it in here to make it concrete and official and we’ll let the 2 posts see who wins the credibility contest.

            You willing to stand by your opinion or are you just bluster?

            • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I’m not even voting for Jill Stein, friend.

              Also, I don’t have to explain myself to you at all. About anything.

              You lose all credibility when you say things like, “Putin’s Jizz Stein.” Try disagreeing without name-calling.