• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    Seems like a good idea. It’s not like any cars or busses actually drive there, being all stuck in congestion anyway.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      I read a while back that the average speed of a bus in central London is 3 (three!) miles per hour.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    I remember walking down Oxford Street as a kid and the pollution from all the vehicles stuck in traffic there was choking. I know they’ve worked on pollution measures since but I’m sure people still avoid it because of that.

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, it’s not exactly a fun walk even now. I normally go through Soho if I’m in the area even if it takes longer.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s a bit like saying you can find cheaper rollercoasters outside Disney Land.

    It’s true, but price isn’t why people go. It’s prestige and experience.

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    They’ll never compete against online shopping prices or convenience. Making it harder to traverse isn’t going to fix that. But it will make it a nicer day out for tourists.

    • christophski@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Harder to traverse for whom? Nobody drives down there currently so this would be no different. This will actually make it much easier for the tens of thousands of people that walk there every day

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      Who drives down Oxford Street? I think I’ve done it once in 20 years. Other roads are available.

      • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ll actively avoid it and take other routes. When I did removals in London, we’d go out of our way to avoid similar roads, they’re always extra hassle. It makes loads of sense to prioritise pedestrians

      • HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Whenever I have walked down there it’s mostly buses and taxis with a few cars peppered in.

        Been ages since I’ve walked along there but I remember far more people than cars and at times the street is completely empty.

        • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          I know, but I’m a rebel! I don’t just break the rules, I make the rules! Which I then break, which is somewhat counterproductive but that’s rebels for you.

          ~Also, I suspect it was at least 15 years ago when I last drove down it!~

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      Making it harder to traverse

      Have you ever actually walked down oxford street?
      The pavements are normally crammed, and there are 3 million cars a minute fighting for the road space.
      Adding 5x as much space for pedestrians is a fantastic idea.

      It’ll be a tiny, tiny minority of people not visiting OS because they can’t park/taxi/bus to the shop front, and a huge number of people going there because it’s a nice experience with no traffic.

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Have you ever actually walked down oxford street?

        Sorry, I weren’t looking through my ableist lens properly.

          • Mrkawfee@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            These carbrains always start pearl clutching about the disabled at times like these

          • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think there are disabled people that aren’t able to travel autonomously/independently and that the public transportation available is a godsend to them.

            • frazorth@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              It’s a difficult one, as you can’t optimise for everyone. However if someone is really so disabled that they can’t travel independently to the point that walking down a road is problematic then they are really going to struggle with Oxford St. today.

              All the busses and taxis running down the middle of the road will prevent them from crossing to access all the other shops. They would probably be better off visiting one of the many other shopping areas rather than a tourist trap.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Are you arguing the whole world needs to allow driving up to businesses so disabled people can shop?

              • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                The whole world isn’t even allowed to drive up there now, so why would anyone, let alone me, argue for that? Don’t be ridiculous.

                The whole sub-thread was me saying that this affects some people in negative ways and everyone acting like what I said is the worst thing ever.

                Not surprising given that my initial comment was me effectively commenting that the time of big shopping streets is at an end due to the fact that it’s cheaper online but that it would be good for tourism.

                I didn’t even use big words, I don’t know what there is to be confused about. 😵‍💫

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Wouldnt disabled folk already shop online?

                  I was taking issue with the idea that making people walk farther to a place is always bad for disabled people.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 days ago

      But it will make it a nicer day out for tourists.

      Isn’t that what Oxford Street is, more or less a tourist attraction? I don’t imagine many people going for their weekly shop.

    • stormesp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except most studies say that when you limit car traffic and have the streets be walkable more people walk through that street and the business of most shop increases?

    • frankPodmore@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      You are right that they can’t compete directly with online shopping, but that’s not why people go there. Studies have consistently shown that closing shopping areas to through-traffic is good for businesses, precisely because it makes them easier, not harder, to access. Shops don’t benefit in any way from hundreds of cars (or, in this case, buses and taxis) driving past them!

      EDIT: Thought I should link to a specific study rather than just vaguely waving at them. There are many to choose from but this one is particularly interesting because it’s from the US, where they generally don’t have good cycling and public transport infrastructure, but it still shows benefits for businesses:

      While we observed some mixed results, we generally found that street improvements have either positive impacts on corridor economic and business performance or non-significant impacts.

      It’s important to note that nothing always works everywhere (‘some mixed results’, here), but the balance of evidence is in favour of at least trialling traffic reduction schemes in commercial districts.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      i have never understood this, online shopping is hilariously much more expensive and inconvenient than just popping down to the shops

      also removing cars almost always makes it easier to get around, not sure why you’d think it would make things harder?

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        online shopping is hilariously much more expensive and inconvenient than just popping down to the shops

        On what planet?

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I read it, and there was a weird claim that pedestrianisation would make it harder for the poor’s to access.

        Because they couldn’t either take the underground, or a bus, to the end of the road.