That “but” is irrelevant if you understand at all how the American electoral system works. You choose the lesser or the greater of two evils. Always. You want to change the party itself, vote in the primaries.
yes, yes, sell your soul to Genocide and maybe you can buy it back if you vote hard enough! Or at least they’ll only increase the state sponsored genocide by a little bit more each year! That is… uhhh. good? Yes thats what I want to call that. Good!
Wild you can say a but about still murdering tons of small children is irrelevant.
Ok, but only one side is calling for murdering literally all of the children, and that’s the Republicans. Democrats are at least attempting to work towards peace and provide humanitarian aid.
It’s fine if you say that’s not enough. I agree. But it’s not “kill em all”.
Fucking lol ok. Well, tried to be sane and reasonable but clearly you’re not here for that. My bad. Sorry for treating you like a person.
That “but” is irrelevant if you understand at all how the American electoral system works. You choose the lesser or the greater of two evils. Always. You want to change the party itself, vote in the primaries.
yes, yes, sell your soul to Genocide and maybe you can buy it back if you vote hard enough! Or at least they’ll only increase the state sponsored genocide by a little bit more each year! That is… uhhh. good? Yes thats what I want to call that. Good!
Wild you can say a but about still murdering tons of small children is irrelevant.
Doesn’t change the calculation. Murder more children, or less children?
If all the children are dead either way then you haven’t actually murdered less children.
Ok, but only one side is calling for murdering literally all of the children, and that’s the Republicans. Democrats are at least attempting to work towards peace and provide humanitarian aid.
It’s fine if you say that’s not enough. I agree. But it’s not “kill em all”.