• JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That’s closer to the $45/hour it actually needs to be so, yes, but mostly we keep going.

    It needs to be tied to some figure or other so it goes up automatically.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, better than not going up but $18 would have been reasonable years ago and now it should be far higher.

    • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Last time I checked 25 bucks is cost of living but it’s been a couple years. I wouldn’t be surprised if it should be higher now.

  • Realitaetsverlust
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The problem with minimum wages is that they also drive up prices over time. This is a bandaid to a much bigger problem.

      • Realitaetsverlust
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        While lower salaries would decrease the amount of financial pressure on companies and could lead to more competitivepricesz, I don’t think that that would be the correct avenue to walk down no.

        I think the only real solution to that is to break up mega corporations and try to fund and subsidize local businesses.

        Capitalism has been a blessing for everyone, even those clowns on lemmy.ml or other clown instances, but when globalization hit, it went downhill. Trying to promote local businesses again would - at least in my opinion - better the entire system, from wages to prices to work conditions.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s why they also need to introduce a maximum wage. To stop prices going up from paying the ceo too much.

          • Realitaetsverlust
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Because minimum wages cause significant cost for companies, which they are forced to pay by law.

            High salaries are not mandatory and if a company can’t afford it, they don’t pay that much.

  • sp3tr4l
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    https://rentalrealestate.com/data/rent/california/

    Avg Studio Apartment Rent: $1575

    Required Hourly Wage for rent to be 1/3 of income, working 40 hrs a week (taxes ignored): $29.54

    Avg One Bed Rent: $1724

    Required Hourly Full Time Wage (Ignoring Taxes): $32.33

    Avg Two Bed Rent: $2,161

    Required Hourly Full Time Wage (Ignoring Taxes): $40.52

    So basically, you can afford a studio apartment on a full time min wage job if you share it with someone who works about 20 hrs a week at min wage…

    … all ignoring taxes on your income.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The best part is there’s a lot of data now about how the raise in minimum wage has helped in California.

  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    An important note I feel was fucking unnecessary in this, though I did vote yes because I’m not a moron:

    Inflation Adjustments Paused Until 2027. The minimum wage would be adjusted for inflation every year starting in 2027. These adjustments would follow the current rules described earlier.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    If minimum wage is always 10+ years behind what a living wage should be, what’s the point? People can’t survive on $18 an hour, so the focus should only be on living wage.