• Krauerking@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “So, there is no such thing as citizens,” he said, referring to the ability of Hamas fighters to blend with civilians. “This is terrorism.”

    Fuck the IDF

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yeah, I suppose it was traumatic, bombing food relief convoys and hospitals. You could have avoided a lot of that PTSD by refusing to follow illegal orders.

    Also, get farked, CNN.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      My interpretation of this is that some mid-level staffers at CNN pushed the story knowing exactly what was in it. Their bosses wouldn’t let them do obvious things, so they got a little subtle.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Some have labelled Israel as a rogue nation, but their actions are explicitly and implicitly condoned through other nation’s support and silence.

    • voldage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think that’s really the case though? I’m pretty sure most nations condemned Israel except for USA, but USA blocked all attempts from anyone to do anything. And when USA says that commiting genocide with their weapons is on the table, I doubt any country wishes to find out what would happen should any concrete action against Israel be taken. It’s a big part of the reason why everyone calls USA complicit in genocide of Palestinians.

      • Tudsamfa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 minutes ago

        I have no reason to believe Germany’s government condemns Israel’s actions right now, and the way they always point out its right to defend itself, I suspect they actively condone them…

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Didn’t the US use to invade countries for much, much less of a reason than that? Sheesh.

    These days I’m finding myself agreeing with the Iranian government more and more often because of Israel’s crap. I don’t like agreeing with the Iranian government.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No, human rights and that stuff hasn’t been the actual reason for any invasions for a long time. It might have been used as an excuse, but it’s generally really about power and/or economics.

      Read about what actually happened in places like Guatemala, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Nicaragua, and Panama. Think about what the actual reasons are for opposing communism, especially considering the timeline of what was known when recruiting Nazis for the opposition to (former ally) USSR, invading Korea, and invading Vietnam.

      If you only want to dive into one of those, just look up Guatemala and Edward Bernays (a massive piece of shit).

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I find myself asking “How did I fall for this? How did this seem normal my whole life until now?”

      We didn’t hear the whole story during the Holocaust. Now we’re getting live videos and firsthand accounts of steam rolling crowds.

      What the fuck is wrong with a person to be OK with this at all.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Mis/under -education (propaganda), lies through omission. Once the realization occurs, it’s a choice to live in denial and ignore it.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          “We didn’t hear the whole story during the Holocaust.” (emphasis mine).

          It seems meant in the sense of back then people weren’t hearing about what was going on in near real time, and only afterwards was the full dimensions of the horror discovered.

          Mind you, I don’t think we are hearing the whole story of this Holocaust in near real time either: it’s not for nothing that Israel has blown up the Hospitals (were the dead were counted), has murdered over 1000 journalists and is blocking them and aid organisations from entering Gaza - all of which stops people outside from discovering the full scope of what the Israelis are doing in Gaza.

          We are hearing enough to know its a Genocide, but the full dimension of the thing (possibly with it, in scope and in methods used, already being or well on its way to be a new Holocaust - I mean, just look at how this piece from CNN unwittingly reveals how they’re sistematically using buldozers to turn the appartment buildings they blew up into in situ mass graves for the victims, dead or even still alive) will only be discovered later if at all.

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Just a bit of history, in WWII the Allies didn’t know for certain that the Holocaust had occurred. Remember that it was the 1940s, information could travel quickly but only so much. It wasn’t as easy for them back then to pickup the metaphorical ‘signal’ of the Holocaust happening to the ‘noise’ the rest of the war was making. So while there were rumors of mass executions of Jewish people as early as the summer of 1941, it’s often said that the Allies didn’t know about the Holocaust until winter 1945. Now when the Allies went from ignorant, to suspicious, to all but certain but with doubts and finally to certain without a doubt has been debated for decades and will probably be debated until the sun expands and swallows the earth whole. There was definitely a lot of hateful rhetoric being spouted about Jewish people in the 1930s that maybe should have been stopped before it nearly took over Europe, but looking back at history we have the advantage of hindsight.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m hoping they mean that we were using slower forms of communication without immediate evidence and we still stepped in to help…

          But I’d rather them say that.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Nobody of the normal populace knew. Do you really think the jews would get on those trains without putting up a real fight? Bringing their belongings, jewellery in suitcases to Dachau, Auschwitz?

          Does that sound like actions of someone who knew what was going to happen?

          Yes, a lot of people knew what was going on. A lot of people, more people, didn’t know shit. The problem was not that. The problem was that they didn’t care.

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You might well be right but I find it troublesome at best.

            I mean, the gestapo simply couldn’t have rounded up that many Jewish people without huge help from the local population, as the area they had to cover with such small numbers made that impossible.

            People knew that no one came back from the camps people were sent to or were even heard of again.

            People did put up real fights where they could. The problem was the collective punishment the nazis used really curtailed much of this. Also, people don’t ever think they’re going to die. We understand it in an abstract way but, in turn, the concept is too abstract for us to fully realise.

            Personally, I lean towards it being a far more uncomfortable truth. Although, i understand why others might not.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So, I hate to be this guy for Israel. But there are legal ways for this to have happened. I know the first picture in all of our heads is them running over prisoners. But it is a valid tactic to collapse your enemies trenches or building on top of them. The US has been doing that since at least Vietnam. Armored bulldozers are, of course, uniquely pretty good at this tactic. Although it is usually a tank with a bulldozer blade attached to the front.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Poor guy. Did he also have to murder the little baby terrorists and their sobbing, horrified terrorist moms and terrorist sisters too? Poor fella. I hope he can muster the strength to do the right thing.

    Fuck Israel and fuck conservatives (including neoliberals) who gleefully support this genocide. The wrong people are being erased.

  • Fosheze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Ah yes, those hundreds of “terrorists” all nicely lined up in the road.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I swear this is almost trying to parody the title of the article about the 19 year old who was burned alive

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m sure we’ll soon get an article about how the pilot felt sad about bombing a hospital.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Something about he at the end of a hard day of bombing schoolyards and hospitals filled with “human animals” going home to his young wife and 5 month old baby with a sad look on his face.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    In the aughts, once the US torture programs started getting public attention around 2003, I did my obsessive thing on the German Reich and the Holocaust.

    During Operation Barbarossa, the SS was experimenting with eradication methods. The most common was the pogrom, endorsing the locals to massacre the undesirables. When they weren’t undesirable enough or it was the whole village, the einsatzgruppen (death squads) had to come do it, usually forcing them to dig a mass grave and then executing them along the side.

    It was messy and brutal and gross, and there was high turnover among the death squads (the US has a similar problem with its combat drone operators). And this was a major problem.

    The SS experimented with other ideas, including deathwagons that would pipe the vehicle’s exhaust into an enclosed chamber to kill dozens at a time, but even that was too harsh and too slow.

    This is how the prototype genocide machine was made at Auschwitz. The program was contrived so no one who interacted with the live prisoners also interacted with the dead corpses. The guy who pushed the execute button was two persons removed in the chain of command from the guy who signed off on the execution order, and none of those people had to face the prisoners or the outcome. The point specifically was to make the process of massacre less stressful for the people involved.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There was a Sonderkommando of Jews in Auschwitz forced calm down inmates before murdering them and to rob and cremate them afterwards. Exactly to keep the psychic toll lower on the SS and to ensure fewer witnesses.

      • Benjaben@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It’s funny, I had the opposite reaction, I see this as pretty strong evidence of our decency. It’s really, really hard to get most people to behave this way, and the ones who do wind up fucked up from it (as they should).

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 hours ago

          True. It’s hard to make people kill, but it’s much too hard to teach soldiers to refuse an amoral order.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    You would think it would be easy to find some poor conscript fuck who didn’t run over civilians in a bulldozer struggling with the fact that they were coerced into being part of a genocide, but no, CNN goes with the guy who crushed human beings. Even as attempted hasbara, that’s some high-level incompetence in CNN.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      CNN has to run every story through the Israeli censor in their Jerusalem bureau. The only mainstream outlet that doesn’t go through that process is Al Jazeera, and Israel closed their offices.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Precisely: this is the story CNN and the IDF want you to see. No matter the CNN reader’s reaction, the policy will not change.

        So they do the thing because it is a demonstration that they can do the thing without repercussions. Bullingdon Club type mentality.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    reminds me of this bit:

    “not only will america go to your country and kill all your people but they’ll come back 20 years later and make a movie about how killing your people made their soldiers feel sad.”

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I hope not that he dies but that he lives to watch everything he cares about crumble to dust as he is powerless to the winds of change

        • Gloomy@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Bulldozed over them. Alive and dead. Couldn’t take the gore no longer.

          I have empathy for him, honesty. He belived the propaganda about defending the country an all that. Then was ordered to to horrible things. He experienced the difference between a lie told and a lie lived and just couldn’t deal with it.

          He not the bad guy here.