It’s kind of funny, I think, that a plant so closely associated with America is actually not native at all.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sure, but the same applies to so many foods in so many cultures. What was Italian food like before they had access to tomatoes? Eastern, Central European, or Irish before potatoes? Chinese, Southeast Asian, or Korean before they had chili peppers?

    Now each of those countries have dishes we associate with them but which use those non-native ingredients.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The more impressive thing is how the British had a global empire for roughly 400 years, and their cuisine remained awful.

      • Rubanski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think that’s because British food we commonly see as awful stems from food rationing that went on during and after WWII, as far as I know well in the 1970s

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          That seems like a poor excuse, every country experienced rationing and they didn’t revert to awful food. There’s even a few dishes like fried spam and ramen that are actually pretty good.