• socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “Critical support” is a fundamentally reactionary concept so the tankies newest thing is that they love Islamic fundamentalists simply because they are in conflict with the West.

    • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They seem to dislike france’s freedom of speech and their anti-islam stance.

      … No, it does not make sense. I don’t have a clue.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think it has more to do with Macron and his bedding of right-wing fascists to avoid a left-wing government coalition

        That, and their funding of religious ethnostate terrorists…

        Edit: i don’t get it, is it something I said?

        Edit 2: OK, I was wrong about the specific context of the comment, but I’ll take partial credit for guessing it had to do with the war in Gaza

        • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, the dislike of a democratically elected leader is reasonable clause to call for innocent french people to die in a massacre

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I didn’t say it was reasonable, I was only answering the question as to why they were angry with France.

            I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

            • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I think what the west deserves for funding a genocidal fascist is entirely up for debate, but that they deserve something is pretty well justified, IMHO

              Are you trying to say the West deserves violence? Advocating for violence isn’t allowed in this community or instance.

                • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  And what will this justice be? Because the post is saying a massacre.

                  I think it’s pretty telling you were advocating for violence, and now you’re forced to backtrack.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I wasn’t advocating for anything, I was answering the question about why they were angry with the french.

                    And what will this justice be?

                    If it were me, i’d say the west should face international sanction and prosecution in the Hague for all leaders/diplomats accused of willfully collaborating with a genocide. Of course, a western-controlled criminal court would never do such a thing, so I guess all we have is BDS and public protest.

              • Tangentism@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Maybe the west should lay off the fucking violence themselves and not bleat when it gets dished back to them once in a while.

                • goat@sh.itjust.worksOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The West? All of the West? You hear that New Zealand?! You cowards!

                  But legitimately, ‘dished back to them?’ – Not very pro-peace of you. Violence begets violence. You should aim for peace, not more war.

                  • Tangentism@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Point to on the doll where I was advocating violence.

                    The reading comprehension of people nowadays is shockingly poor because if it was better, you would have grasped that I was pointing out that it’s fairly hypocritical to go around being a cunt to other countries then cry like a fucking baby when they do the same shit back to you.

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I didn’t say it was reasonable

              This is true, and we’ll all let you continue to hide behind what you say directly while you are here defending the stance “of which you didn’t directly state”.

              Take your doublespeak elsewhere 🤷