• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Eh, if you use the Lightning network, Bitcoin is quite private, provided you don’t close the channels you use.

    That said, I agree that Monero is a lot more reasonable than Bitcoin for actual transactions. I don’t see a point in holding Bitcoin, Monero is much better suited to making everyday purchases because transaction costs are low and privacy features are solid. Yeah, it can be used for crime, but so can cash, so I don’t think that has any bearing on whether a currency has value.

    • shortwavesurfer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Two big issues with lightning network are that channels appear to get force closed for no apparent reason and most lightning wallets are custodial lightning and so you don’t actually have control over your money and doing it in a self sovereign way is quite difficult for the vast majority of people

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Right, but it can be used privately, which is my point.

        But yeah, I think Monero is the better option for the reasons you mentioned, as well as the development focus being on private transactions, whereas Lightning is about fast, cheap transactions. So Monero is absolutely my preference for purchase transactions.

        • shortwavesurfer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Monero is also just quite a bit easier since it is on layer one where lightning is a layer two solution and introduces more complexity.