• UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    23 days ago

    I watched the launch trailer.

    It was an Overwatch clone fused with a Guardians of the Galaxy clone.

    I suppose some bazinga fusion dances aren’t meant to be.

    • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      23 days ago

      As I understand it, the game bombed beyond the point of being salvageable - tens of millions of dollars and around a decade in development, but it only peaked at a few hundred concurrent players, then fell off rapidly.

      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        tens of millions of dollars

        Several hundreds, based on the estimates I’ve heard. The whole project was a grift, and once again a former gaming exec already absconded to let the workers hold the bag.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 days ago

      Why did they react so massively, instead of dicking with patches?

      Its fundamental issues were really just two things: it was a $40 game competing in a stale genre dominated by well established F2P games, and literally nobody even knew it existed in the first place. It had nothing selling it, Sony didn’t do anything to manufacture any sort of enthusiasm, and the first time anyone heard about it was when there were a ton of “lmao you ever heard of Concord? No? Well get this, nobody’s playing it! This game you haven’t heard of, that nobody’s heard of? It’s dead, complete flop, what a joke amirite?” articles that sealed its fate because PvP games more than anything live on player confidence and investment (hence why F2P live service models have become basically mandatory for them, because anyone can “just try” those which helps keep the population numbers high enough that people keep playing).

      It’s still kind of weird they didn’t shuffle it around and rerelease it as a F2P live service game, which it probably could have survived as, but honestly after getting the “dead game in the first 12 hours” rep it probably wasn’t ever going to draw in crowds because all anyone associated it with was it being dead and unpopular.

  • grandepequeno [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    23 days ago

    I remember when people were upset that Tencent closed down Kaiju studios before they even released their game. That’s the studio co-founded by former Halo 4 design director Scott Warner and Dice’s Rosi Zagorcheva that was working on a “AAA multiplayer game”, the whole team got reassigned to work on other tencent projects.

    But after this concord stuff I’m thinking, what if that project was also a shitshow, and they just decided to pull the plug on it and get everyone working on other stuff before the hole got too deep, and how it might’ve been better if sony had done the same with concord and firewalk earlier on.

  • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    I still think game could have been mid/okay-ish to even decent if it was just a co-op hero shooter rather than a PVP thing. Like somewhere between a Destiny and a Borderlands. Also being PvE would have been one of the things it could have done to distinguish itself rather than just being yet another hero-shooter map control cart-pushing game.

    I genuinely kinda liked the look and visual design. Honestly with i think co-op PVE could have been a big play for them.