• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    lasers are way slower than bullets they are super easy to dodge, have you never even seen star wars?

    • ziggurat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s phasers, the lasers in star trek at instantaneous… Oh you said star wars

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Star wars uses different physics, you can actually see light move there. Wouldn’t work on earth.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Star Wars universe must be stuck in an Octarine field, as that makes light move very slowly.

  • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, but the one top (Chad position) looks sexy as hell, while the one on the bottom looks like someone kitbashed it from sprue frames

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Firing a piece of munition that is worth many times the target is a win for the enemy even if you hit it, they can just keep lobbing Ali Express crap at you until you run out of missiles.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I suspect that a mass-produced shell with a time fuze can be made more-cheaply than a drone.

      I also kinda suspect that using a pulse laser on a drone runs the risk of eye damage to anyone nearby and looking at the thing, from reflected light.

  • dch82
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Genuinely curious: can they destroy large swarms of drones given the time to load?