Because you now did it to yourself.

  • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Nah Trump won the popular vote too. This has nothing to do with voters staying at home. Trump won on the economy. I went to the gas station before voting yesterday and a redbull was $4 and a small bag of chips $3. I knew at that point there is a good chance that Trump would win.

    • Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah price gouging by companies because of what they got away with during a shitty handling of covid under trump is a great reason to bring him back.

      He is back because Americans are stupid and gullible. It really is that simple.

      • fosho@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        it really is that simple. inflation is a global problem and many Americans are so stupid that they think he can and will do anything about it.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      I went to the gas station before voting yesterday and a redbull was $4 and a small bag of chips $3. I knew at that point there is a good chance that Trump would win.

      I don’t understand any logic that suggests Trump would improve this situation.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 days ago

        Like many things, trumpers are happy to believe it whether the logic is there or not.

        I’ve seen real people I know personally, people with degrees and with jobs that affect people’s lives, honestly look forward to the lower gas prices and inflation if he were to get elected.

        In think there’s just a lot of ignorance, and people not paying attention to real events and falling back to thinking that voting Republican means you support hard work and white people and saving money, while voting Democrat means you support tax & spend and love lazy minorities.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        😮‍💨 point to the biden policy that would please. Then point to the harris campaign platform stating how she’d fix it. In fact harris took steps to signal she wouldn’t fix it by not committing to Khan.

        Neither candidate was going to fix it. So whats next in the list?

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          They were doing more than Trump will.

          https://qz.com/ftc-probe-grocery-price-surge-consumers-inflation-1851611874

          And even if neither of them would fix it - how is that a reason to vote Trump?

          Edit:

          That’s been the logic problem through this entire election.

          Yes, Kamala dodged right when many of us wanted her to dodge left. I get that, and it frustrates me as well.

          But on ANY issue where they were equally bad policy-wise, how does one look back and forth between Trump and Harris and go “Well, clearly Trump”

          Folks act like for any tossup issue between them the obvious advantage is with the racist, convicted felon, rapist, demented, shitbag. Somehow Trump just has to be on the same level as Harris to get the nod, but Harris only does if she miles and miles better on an issue. I just don’t get it.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            And she lost the lack of self reflection that has inspired in you is why this will keep happening.

        • arglebargle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Under Trump in 2019 inflation was 2.3 percent. It dropped during Covid and then jumped to 7% in 2021. It has been declining ever since to 2.4% today. So a disaster, then a recovery, and people STILL think it was Bidens fault.

          Price gouging is what it became and that is slowly getting better. The FTC is taking steps to help. But somehow people think “lets vote for the billionaires! Surely they have a plan to make chips 99 cents again!”. We only need to deregulate and cut corporate taxes (again) and it will all be better for Johnny Six Pack!

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            shrug are people blaming biden for inflation? or for his lack of action against price gouging? those are two very different reasons with similar outcomes for biden and harris.

            • arglebargle@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Yes. They blamed him for inflation. That is the buzzword.

              Biden ordered the FTC and the DOJ to work together and fight shrinkflation, price gouging, and deceptive practices. In March!

              He also went after credit card fees and deceptive and predatory loans. He said he took this on when the economy was recovering and inflation was going down.

              So what are you talking about?

              The FTC has been very active, deceptive practices, fraud, schemes, price gouging, data leaks, personal data protections… so many things.

              I suppose that is all going to end now.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                yup I’m aware. harris also refused to commit to keeping khan. So americans assuming they’re aware of these facts have two signals, one from the biden admin and the other from harris herself. personally I’m going to infer from the one harris sent herself.

                But remember most americans dont care and dont pay attention to presidential orders unless they’re effective; and the price of milk, eggs, and cereal are still 50%, if not more, higher than they should be. so how effective was biden? Why are my kellog flakes $7 dollars when the store brand is $3? its clearly not a supply chain/manufacturing issue the products are identical. this is rhetorical for you to think about what youre saying.

                • arglebargle@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  The question was if they blamed Biden. Nothing to do with Harris, but since you mention it, yeah that is really troubling for Harris supporters.

                  I agree Americans dont pay much attention. They also are bizarrely confused about who to blame. The president doesn’t set prices, companies do. There was a period of inflation put into place from Trumps tax policy in 2017 expiring to recovery acts during Covid. Prices went up. Why would a business lower them now? They are no longer going up at 7%, but the prices were coming back down.

                  So “Why are my kellog flakes $7 dollars when the store brand is $3”? Because people will pay for it?

                  • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    So “Why are my kellog flakes $7 dollars when the store brand is $3”? Because people will pay for it?

                    and thats why biden’s admin is at historically low approval. like you he was unwilling to take the steps he needed to take to stop the gouging. its why he was ousted and harris lost.

                    not because of their policies that were ineffective. but because they wouldn’t fight. they wouldn’t fight for workers, they wouldn’t fight for arabs.

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        What in saying is that it probably doesn’t have much to do with Gaza. People voted on the economy.

        • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’d argue that 98% of US voters don’t care about Gaza whatsoever. It’s a wedge issue for a very small minority but was unlikely to significantly affect the race in the big picture.

          Almost everybody I know bitches about the price of groceries (regardless of where they place the blame) but I only know a couple people in the Real/Outside World who regularly talk about the Gaza genocide.

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Mmm now explain to me how you were going to get harris to shift on inflation, a position she already signalled she’d fire the most effective agent we have for it. (Khan).

          When you wouldnt even be budged on mass murder? God do i dread the conversations about how to fight inflation effectively due to corporate greed. That is a hard and incredibly nuanced conversation with no clear answer. Gaza is easy in comparison.

          You’d just blame us for undermining harris over inflation instead of gaza. The topic doesn’t matter.

          You jnow the most effective way to get people to vote? Give. Them. What. They. Want.

          For Michigan it was gaza, for Pennsylvania it was inflation. Sadly your too politically unaware and rather just blame others for not seeing reason than challenging your candidate for their shit platform.

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              And you realize thats the issue right? You bought into lesser evil so hard you gave harris the signal she could shit on arabs, laborers, lgbt+, women and still get their vote instead of putting forward policies that would have got people to show up. Combine that with the prior that trump is so bad a red wave wouldn’t happen and you made a perfect environment for harris to run a shit campaign.

              Americans didnt want biden 2.0 they wanted a firebrand who’d gonafter corporations, tackle inflation, bring back the american dream. Houses. Etc.

              But na, its everyone elses fault.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’m sure Trump will get right on that and reduce those gas station snack prices for you