• Altima NEO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    12 days ago

    No, they were initially applied for in 2021.

    • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Palworld had trailers featuring gameplay in 2021. Besides that, there are lots of games where you throw an object to add a character to your party. Including another earlier game by PocketPair called Craftopia. World of Warcraft added “battle pets” where you can throw a cage to catch animals and add them to your battle pets roster to fight against other trainers in 2012.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        to add on to this, the video is dated in june 2021, and the patent show in japan wasnt registered until december 2021, which means palworld was already well on the way prior to them actually submitting these patents.

        all three of the patents listed in the article have a japanese patent registered on 12/22/21. Palworld appears to have working gameplay mechanics by june of 2021 as shown by their announcement trailer.

    • Ascyron@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      That’s not what this article says. Earliest application was March 5, 2024.

      Palworld was released on Jan 18th, 2024, a month and a half beforehand.

      • Altima NEO
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Look at the actual patents, though. They list 2021 as the application date in Japan.

        • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 days ago

          The patents being referred to by the article are not Japanese patents. Did you know Japan has its own court system?

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Why are you lying? The article links to a google patents page, under the Japanese patents. There are US versions of these patents available to view, which the article didn’t link to.

            JP7545191 is a japanese patent. You can click one of the little blue US buttons to see the American equivalent. The same is true of the other two patents in question

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                What do the dates in them have to do with you getting that basic piece of information wrong? If you have a point to make, make it.

                • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 days ago

                  The court systems processed them on different dates. You’re the one being belligerent and incorrect. Condescend on someone else, learn to read the stuff you link or at least make an attempt to understand it lol

                  Japan and the US have seperate requirements (first to file VS first to invent) for initially accepting a patent. Just because you can see them both on the USPTO website doesn’t mean the patents are for both the US and Japan. In Japan, you can legally oppose a product before the patent is granted - in the US, that doesn’t fly.

                  If you can’t piece together what my point was with this info, you should probably stop commenting on patent cases until you do understand. You quite literally linked info showing the dates of the US patents that are after the release of palworld. Either you didn’t read the thing you linked or you have some warped perception of patents being global.

                  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    at least make an attempt to understand it lol

                    That’s what I’m trying to do, and the best you can manage to explain to me is “actually you’re wrong.” You have time to type out three paragraphs, but not enough time to explain that the patents the page links to, despite being apparently (as far as I can discern) filed with the Japanese patent office, are not Japanese patents?

                    I admit I don’t really know what I’m talking about. The patent system is obtuse and virtually impossible to understand. But as far as I can tell, the patents referred to by the article are patents that were filed with the Japanese office. Can you explain what I’m getting wrong?

                    You quite literally linked info showing the dates of the US patents that are after the release of palworld.

                    I’m aware of that. The person you were responding to said “Look at the actual patents, though. They list 2021 as the application date in Japan.” Do you want to explain why the website apparently shows an initial application date of 2021 in Japan? Maybe the google patents page is misleading. Maybe it’s showing a related but not equivalent patent.

                    I really don’t care about the process or validity of suing, nor do I care about the actual application date. I just want to know why it looks a lot like the patents the site links to are Japanese patents, and you’re insisting that they’re not.