Source

Not visible in the map, but interesting to note, is that in France the trains normally drive on the left, except in Alsace where they drive on the right as a legacy of the time the province belonged to Germany.

  • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    All of our trains in Lebanon have been ripped out in the 60s and 70s so we can siphon our money more efficiently to the patron class by buying cars and gas through their companies. Granted cars make sense for the topography but trains should have stayed in operation, especially for freight.

    Not sure how recent some of these data points are, unless it just describes the law for some of these if less data is available

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        soooo does the difference between x-handed and x-handed 20% multi-track mean that the x-handed colouring has >80% single lane tracks?

        i live in australia (left-handed), and… that seems… implausible

        • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That seems to be the insinuation.

          Based on what I know, lengths of track with a single line of rail typically have periodic sections with sidetracks to allow trains to “pull over” and let an oncoming (usually the faster) train pass them before returning to the main track.

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Hmmm I mean I guess we’re a very big country for our population so maybe the mining and interstate rail overwhelm the metro and Sydney-Melbourne networks… I’m just surprised it’s by more than 80%

            • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you go by length instead of ridership it seems extremely plausible. Australia is a big place and building 2 lanes for mostly freight trains is an unnecessary expense.

              Sidings/loops/passing tracks, allow trains to pass on a single track, and since things can be more regular scheduled (ideally anyway) with trains, they can work well enough and with much less track building needed.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    The terminology of this map confuses me quite a bit. Austria has mostly right-hand traffic nowadays, the Franz-Josefs-Bahn being the only exception I am aware of; it used to be a lot more mixed until the early-to-mid-2010s.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are the legend markers not ordered? Or is ‘Left-hand traffic with exceptions’ really more ‘left-hand’ than ‘Left-hand traffic’?

    • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it is less. And more than 20% share is more. As in, we do left handed, and we also have a significant portion of our network that is multi track and therefore abides by that convention. As opposed to somewhere that is just left handed, but doesn’t have a mature/extensive use of that convention because their network is smaller/sparser