Honestly call or email the Democratic party offices and voice that you one hundred percent agree with Sanders.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean they lost what 10mil votes? I’m with sanders they need to fix their shit. Get real. They’re going to run Harris again with slightly more left wing policies, Republicans will point out she’s an insincere flip flop and destroy her again. But it will be the DNC not the Republicans that setup the loss.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Pelosi should just gtfo and become a stock broker. She’s unusually good at trading stocks for some obscure reason.

    (The reason is insider trading)

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    We know they don’t respect Sanders.

    Exhibit A: Picking Hilary.

    They RFK’d him.

    • chetradley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Members of the DNC were emailing each other about how best to undermine Sanders’ presidential campaign after promising to remain neutral. Democrats, if you want to inspire voters, let them pick the fucking candidate!

    • rumba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It wasn’t disrespect, it was outright fear.

      They’re afraid that someone is going to get into that position that can’t be bought and is going to grandstand to the public to ask for the things that donors won’t like.

      Corporations are spending a lot of money to own the voices in the government, they don’t want to make any rich people angry.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pelosi is the best example of what’s wrong with Dems. Literally enriched herself off the pain and suffering of the working class and poor.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The dems used to win on policy, but now they do whatever they want (or are paid to do) regardless of the will of their voter base.

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          The fuck are you even talking about? The last shit they could even use their multi-trillion dollar propaganda machine to spin as a positive was RomneyCare.

          If anything you’ve got that backwards. They can run the worst candidates possible with literal fucking fascist policies and still get tens of millions of votes based purely on vibes.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I"m saying they’re good at getting shit done, but horrible at letting anyone know they actually got anything done. I don’t even think they vote on vibes given that no one on the GOP hasn’t given off the most scummy fucking vibes I’ve ever felt.

            Hell Vance and Paul Ryan have basically the same vibes

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I"m saying they’re good at getting shit done, but horrible at letting anyone know they actually got anything done.

              And I’m telling you you’re delusional. The exact opposite is true as evidenced by your own rationalization.

              I don’t even think they vote on vibes given that no one on the GOP hasn’t given off the most scummy fucking vibes I’ve ever felt.

              Did you switch to talking about republicans here? We’re talking about democrats voting and you’re talking about the vibes of the republicans being bad like that’s not literally part of what I already said.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pelosi is wrong about Sanders. But she did not “enrich herself”.

      Bernie is literally quoted in the article saying “Nancy is a friend of mine”.

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        3 days ago

        The main thing she’s known for is rampant unabashed insider trading. If that isn’t enriching herself then I don’t know what is.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Pelosi is wrong about Sanders. But she did not “enrich herself”.

        Are we playing the “it’s her spouse who is the stock investor” game?

        https://www.newsweek.com/how-nancy-pelosi-net-worth-vastly-increased-while-house-speaker-1762361

        Because if this is how one accumulates wealth, it certainly sounds like it’s “off the pain and suffering of the working class and poor.”

        D.C.-based nonprofit OpenSecrets.org estimated Pelosi’s net worth at $115 million in 2020, a rise of $41 million since 2004 - the first year OpenSecrets began tracking members’ personal finances.

        Paul Pelosi’s company, Financial Leasing Services, has been highly successful in its investments in recent years and those investments have included shares in major firms such as Disney, Amazon and Google.

        The New York Post estimated that the Pelosis had made between $5.6 million and $30.4 million between 2007 and 2020 through capital gains and dividends from investments in five tech companies - Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft - based on public disclosures.

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s not really good evidence. They could’ve made more money by just holding an SP 500 index fund. Their recent Visa trade is better evidence.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Fair! But personally it’s my opinion that in all but a vanishingly small number of cases, if someone is sitting on high tens of millions of dollars and on up, I feel very certain that fundamentally this description works:

            Literally enriched herself off the pain and suffering of the working class and poor.

            While there are people who are underpaid and struggling to eat, there’s not a path to that kind of wealth that isn’t directly or indirectly exploiting their pain and suffering.

            Their wealth is itself the evidence.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pelosi’s response kinda proves that the DNC is just the other side of the shit coin running the funhouse arcade game of American democracy

  • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    309
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m not upset Bernie was criticized - no one should be above a good-faith critique and ideas should be judged on merit as opposed to who says them. The reason I disagree with Pelosi is that I think Sanders made some damn good points, and if the Dems don’t listen they are going to fail again.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      3 days ago

      The reason I disagree with Pelosi is that I think Sanders made some damn good points, and if the Dems don’t listen they are going to fail again.

      They would rather fail than listen.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think the biggest issue was actually with messaging. Democrats were still pretty much relying on MSM which almost no young people watch.

      I think that beyond what Sanders says what left needs are young people, true populists (as opposed to pseudopopulists ones like MAGA has) with progressive messages.

      https://runforsomething.net/

      • shikitohno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, I would say an over reliance on mainstream media certainly hurts them, but their messaging still sucks. Just to go with examples Bernie provided here, how do you think the Democrats message that the economy is doing just great resonates with the 60% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, the 25% of elderly people who need to eke out a living on $15,000 a year or less, or the 20 million Americans working for less than $15/hour? It’s a slap in the face to all of them. Messaging is not just getting the message out, but sending the right messages, and the Democrats whiffed hard on that front. They need to do some serious self-reflection and make some drastic changes to both the structure of the party and its platform if they want to do anything more than win the odd election for a single term when the GOP oversteps itself. Pelosi and the old ghouls that support her should all be kicked to the curb.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Like seriously, who do they think they’re fooling? This rhetoric of “the economy is great” doesn’t work on people who are struggling more and more every year through no fault of their own. Nobody but the super rich give a shit about quarterly profits and your definition of recession. The working class has been in “recession” for decades.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            This rhetoric of “the economy is great” doesn’t work on people who are struggling more and more every year through no fault of their own.

            I’m starting to reject the idea that people should get less help even if it is some fault of their own.

            We shouldn’t have a system where if you don’t make every decision perfectly you just deserve what you get and should just suck it up. There should be more ways for people to turn it around, more ways for people to get a mulligan for past (or even recent) bad decisions that helps them get back on their feet or better yet put their feet on a better path.

            Making a bad decision (or two, or three) on education or finances or even (to a point) breaking the law at the youngest and least experienced points in your life should not be something that puts you on an uphill climb for decades afterward.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Honestly I think this is huge. I’m nowhere as old as these dinosaurs but even I’m surprised that people get “news” and info from podcasts and such. Mainly because any old jackass could prattle on about whatever without a single lick of knowledge but…

        That appears to be the case though.

        • Delta_V@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          any old jackass could prattle on about whatever without a single lick of knowledge

          Welcome to rural talk radio.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      These Conservative Democrats are so uninspiring that we’d allow Nazi level fascists to take over.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Conservative democrats are republicans. The dems made their tent so big that it has lost all meaning. I dont recall dem politicians ever going to the right of repubilcans in the past. It would have seemed impossible. Biden/Harris normalized it.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If this is the political reality, then it’s the political reality that must be adapted to.

        Centrists would rather lose.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Based on his remarks, I won’t be shocked if he’s working on organizing a whole new political party that’s going to eventually supplant the Democratic Party altogether.

      And if that’s what he’s doing, and he pulls it off, it’ll be a good thing, and I’ll probably register a political affiliation other than “no party/unaffiliated” for the first time in about 14 years.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Unfortunately his whole political career has been the democrats telling him he’s wrong as they continually shoot themselves in their collective dick.

    I, for one, will be writing in his name, voting third party or not at all until they give me a genuinely progressive candidate. Until then, fuck them, and fuck this country.

    • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      One of the biggest things about being a leftist is being right about stuff before it’s considered polite.

      • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s like being Cassandra, the Greek seer who can see the future but is cursed to forever be not believed.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      What is needed is a socialist organization of voters who together have enough voting power to make our break a Democratic representatives career.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Having the numbers isn’t enough, there needs to be organization. A group of 8% of the electorate that votes in lockstep could affect policy pretty fundamentally, more than any amount of money could.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What is needed is a socialist organization of voters who together have enough voting power to make our break a Democratic representatives career.

        Yes. But it can be any group of voters. Could be a ‘tea party on the left’.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Aren’t organization and group synonymous?

          And of course, this is assuming that Trump isn’t going to establish himself as a dictator. Of course, the thing is Trump is too old to be dictator. And the people around him don’t seem to be the most competent, either. So I sort of don’t know what’s going to happen. In any case, I’m glad that I don’t live in the US, thought authoritarianism is advancing globally.

          • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            If Trump is going to establish himself as a dictator, then this kind of group is even more important. Lots of socialist groups have toppled totalitarian leaders, and when they haven’t, it’s usually because of western countries like the US helping the dictator. Of course, it might have to run underground a bit more, but solidarity between various organizations will be extremely important in the upcoming 4 years.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Now, imagine this sentiment among thousands of people, across multiple states. That’s how you lose an election.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Lmao buddy. Ignoring the people to the left is how you literally just lost an election

      • d00phy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sorry, but losing strategies deserve to lose. Im tired of voting for someone because they’re slightly less bought and paid for.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          The best reason to vote for Harris was because she was going to raise taxes on billionaires and corporations like Biden did also. Why would you NOT do that?

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If two partys are not representing my interests at all, the winning strategy is to make my vote about punishing the one that didnt represent my interests when it was in power. This way it will have to adapt to recognize my interests when it needs my vote to get back to power.

        By just always voting whatever party claims to be the less evil for me, all i do is create a race to the bottom of evil, as i make sure that my vote does not need to be fought for.

      • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        These people are all whooshing hard on what you said. They can’t even imagine non-scold comments anymore.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately his whole political career has been the democrats telling him he’s wrong

      Nope. Neither Biden nor Harris never once told Bernie he is “wrong”.

    • DancingBear@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Clearly this loss lies solely on the shoulders of black and Latino voters, as well as the evil Bernie Bros and the progressives.

      We just need to go further to the right next election while continuing to raise record dark pac money contributions. Then we can win!

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        a paper reciept for recount is an easy way to validate these machines. I’m skeptical of fully digital systems as those are harder to validate.

        • JasonDJ
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          A paper receipt is also a good way to be able to buy someone’s ballot or force them to vote a certain way under threat of violence.

          • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            yeah exactly. ohio (who just elected a shitheel used car salesman to Senate) shows you the printout when you vote, but you can’t take it with you

            edit: i am in favor of this, basically, though I do not like the outcomes in Ohio the last 8 years or so. the state is fucked

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pelosi is wrong. But she is not the owner of the DNC. The DNC is controlled by delegates elected by primary voters. The DNC is not a person or monolithic entity.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The DNC is controlled by delegates elected by primary voters.

        I’m afraid thats not entirely true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

        Also, party leadership constantly changes the rules to suit the election cycle. They are a private entity and can run primaries however they want. In the DNC vs Sanders case, they successfully argued that they can elect canddates in a smoke filled back room if they so chose, and had no legal duty to fairness or in representing the will of the voters whatsoever.

      • pinkystew@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 days ago

        I am not postmateDumbass and can’t speak for them, but Nacy Pelosi serves as a superdelegate, meaning she wasn’t elected to her position in the DNC. Blaming the voters for her presence there is wrong (however, blaming the voters for electing other selfish, poor-performing delegates would be fair game to me). I would guess their frustration is with the system which created this problem. If the people aren’t being heard year after year the group should be replaced by something that actually fucking works.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nacy Pelosi serves as a superdelegate, meaning she wasn’t elected to her position in the DNC.

          You know who is also a superdelegate? BERNIE SANDERS. Being a superdelegate does not make someone “the DNC” nor make you a member of the DNC executive committee.

          I would guess their frustration is with the system which created this problem. If the people aren’t being heard year after year the group should be replaced by something that actually fucking works.

          I’m frustrated too. But if you don’t know how the system works you can’t change it. Instead of railing against an invisible boogyman, focus on individual politicians and the media message.

          And focus on simple and ideas concepts.

          Wealth inequality <-- not nearly enough focus

          Identity politics <-- way too much focus.

  • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Political parties are private institutions and should not be in a position to shape American policies at all. Having a two party system allows centralized control over everyone else in the given party. If elected officials feel pressured to fall in line then they’re not fighting for the American people, they’re fighting for their own political party.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pelosi’s attitude is a big reason why

    She believes voters work for her and need to do what she wants or she scolds them, afterwards they’ll listen.

    Bernie believes the best way to get elected is to show voters you’ll help them.

    One method is very effective, it’s just foreign governments, billionaires, and corporations pay a lot of money to make sure candidates like that never make it out of a primary.

    If an elected official put the average voter first, where does that leave the wealthy?

    Not first? Completely unacceptable, Thurston get my mink we’re leaving.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bernie is one of the few remaining politicians in our country who are in politics as a service vs a career. I wouldn’t be surprised if after every time he gets elected he consoles himself, “this’ll be the last time you need to run, this is the cycle where we’ll fix American politics and you can go back to your dream of opening an ice cream shop.”

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      One method is very effective, it’s just foreign governments, billionaires, and corporations pay a lot of money to make sure candidates like that never make it out of a primary.

      Slight disagreement. They pay a lot of money so candidates like that don’t make it into a primary.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Pelosi interview is honestly batshit insane. She doesn’t see the election as a rejection of the party, thinks the Democrats are doing well, Kamala Harris did everything right, Sanders is wrong, and then she made some backhanded comments about how Biden should have dropped out earlier. I know some of that is spin she that she has to say, but it’s still deeply out of touch.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      123
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Kamala Harris did everything right

      She presented her message of ‘vote for me to keep things the same’ flawlessly. Unfortunately, people who live paycheck to paycheck don’t want things to stay the same.

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        They’re looking forward to wishing they were able to live paycheck to paycheck…

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          62
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          3 days ago

          Lord knows you’re looking forward to watching people suffer just so you can lecture harder.

          Scolding voters into voting for someone who represents no deviation from an untenable status quo has failed, very publicly, twice. It doesn’t matter how bad the opponent is. This strategy is shit. Stop using it. Learn, damn you all. Learn.

          I voted for Harris.

          • teamevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Me too and I wasn’t saying that I’m looking forward to it…I’m saying the economics are going to be horrible and we’re going to long to these times back.

        • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, if Trump pulls the stuff he said he’d pull (Tariffs and mass deportations), then the supply of goods inside the country will fall drastically, resulting in stronger inflation. Which will then result in consumption of anything nonessential to collapse. This will lead to increasing unemployment.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          While that is why will likely happen, most voters aren’t knowledgeable enough to recognize it. They don’t know what tariffs are or how it’ll effect us, for example. They trust the media to tell them the truth, which is horribly misguided.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        She presented her message of ‘vote for me to keep things the same’ flawlessly. Unfortunately, people who live paycheck to paycheck don’t want things to stay the same.

        Nope. Her plan was “I am going to lower taxes on the middle class and provide additional help n these specific ways”. But she presented that plan in a very flawed way.

        That you were not aware of her actual message is partly your fault and partly her fault.