I’m tired of guessing which country the author is from when they use cup measurement and how densely they put flour in it.

  • Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    OP is probably from Western Europe, where a kitchen scale is common. Ain’t nobody in the US got a fancy kitchen scale.

    The solution to their problem is use mL for volume.

    • dondelelcaro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 month ago

      Ain’t nobody in the US got a fancy kitchen scale.

      Lots of us have them. (Well, basic scales which weigh a tenth of a gram.) They’re useful when weighing compressible dry ingredients like flour and brown sugar, and viscous wet ingredients like molasses and corn syrup. They’re also helpful when you’re multiplying a recipe by a factor that doesn’t result in useful units; it’s annoying to figure out how to measure out fractional cups that involve teaspoons.

      They also help with portion control if you’re watching calories.

      • panicnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I have had two different well-recommended scales for baking and neither does a good job measuring 1-3 grams of ingredients. Maybe I just need to spend hundreds of dollars I don’t have on some pampered chef thing….

        I do have what we call the “drug scale” in our house. It can measure to 0.01g but its capacity is so low it is useless for baking. I don’t want to weigh my baking soda badly enough to get it out.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I have one like that that goes up to 400g I think. I tried using it for measuring my creatine powder once but it wasn’t sensitive enough. Trying to cook with it seems like it would be a pain in the ass unless I was making huge batches of stuff.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It can do tenths of grams. That seems pretty good to me. Just seems like it’s more trouble than it’s worth to do small amounts like that by weight anyway.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I have a pretty good scale, but it doesn’t register below 2.5g. You either need a different kind of scale for that sort of thing, or spend a lot of money on a lab-grade scale that can do both light and (relatively) heavy.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Technically oils and milk are lighter per volume than water so the mL to g conversion doesn’t really work. mL only equals g of water, specifically.