• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Because one of them is actively promoting and favouring viewpoints many people find abhorrent.

    The fact it’s owned by a billionaire isn’t the major concern for most people.

    • emb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yes. Having centralized ownership (to whatever extent) is a concern for sure, but it’s a hypothetical concern in and of itself: “what if the leadership does bad things?” Is different from “the leadership is currently doing bad things.”

      Decentralization helps. But if the networks effects aren’t behind it, jumping from platform to platform when things DO get bad is also viable.