But it isn’t actually 3D. Those look like big screens, and if the viewing perspective moved, it would break the illusion. In fact, it looks like the perspective was carefully chosen to align the real world with what’s on the screens, to enhance the 3D effect for the viewer
That, or I was thinking this wasn’t even real, and was more of a “proof of concept” video with the ads edited onto the buildings. So, the person would have to stay still to make it easier to overlay the animations onto the building without having to worry about the angle getting messed up and making it too obvious when the angles of the animation and of the building’s face don’t line up.
I don’t really have any definitive proof of that, though, so it’s honestly only a guess
whoever took this video fucked up by standing still. Move side to side, prove it’s actually 3d.
They only work from one perspective, and expect only the correct-perspective videos to blow up online.
But it isn’t actually 3D. Those look like big screens, and if the viewing perspective moved, it would break the illusion. In fact, it looks like the perspective was carefully chosen to align the real world with what’s on the screens, to enhance the 3D effect for the viewer
That, or I was thinking this wasn’t even real, and was more of a “proof of concept” video with the ads edited onto the buildings. So, the person would have to stay still to make it easier to overlay the animations onto the building without having to worry about the angle getting messed up and making it too obvious when the angles of the animation and of the building’s face don’t line up.
I don’t really have any definitive proof of that, though, so it’s honestly only a guess
Yeah that was what really had me questioning this