Summary

A federal judge has delayed approving the sale of Alex Jones’ media company, Infowars, to The Onion, amid disputes over the auction process.

The Onion won with a $1.75 million bid supported by Sandy Hook families, who agreed to forego their share of sale proceeds for future revenue from a revamped Infowars, enabling other creditors to collect more.

However, a competing bidder backed by Jones, First United American Companies, contested the sale, claiming its $3.5 million bid was unfairly rejected.

The judge plans an evidentiary hearing to ensure transparency.

  • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    the only other bidder in the Infowars auction — First United American Companies, which operates the ShopAlexJones.com website

    Sounds like it’s The Onion, or back to Alex Jones.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      17 hours ago

      He also declined to immediately rule on Jones’ request for a temporary restraining order to disqualify the Onion’s bid, and said “whatever was status quo pre-auction remains status quo” — essentially allowing Jones to remain broadcasting from his flagship platform, Infowars, for the time being.

      “Firing folks a week before Thanksgiving is not what we do, but it sounds like that’s not what occurred,” Lopez said. “Folks are continuing to work.”

      It sounds like the judge is a little too concerned not to cause discomfort to Alex Jones and his Infowars employees. It doesn’t sound promising for The Onion.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That doesn’t sound like he conceded to Jones though, since he rejected his request.

        The auction not immediately changing anything is just how it goes, it’s not a concession to Jones. The onion won the auction, but the sale hasn’t completed. The judge letting them keep operating is both decent to the employees, and routine to not damage an asset while the sale is being handled.

        Imagine it’s a grocery store rather that a shitty news outlet. You buy it for $1 million, but the judge made the previous owners lock the doors and keep workers from showing up. You now have a damaged asset filled with rotten fruit and melted ice cream that you wouldn’t have paid that much for.

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Moreover, the trustee, amongst other powers granted, has a legal expectation to do what is best for whomever he is technically representing. Despite The Onion’s smaller monetary bid, they really did have the higher bid overall.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s fair that the judge says you can’t take control over an asset before he’s even ruled on whether you can take control over it. The opposite would be kinda silly.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Right? And the onion didn’t even ask to take control of it because the sale isn’t final.

            Jones is just throwing a hissy fit about things that aren’t happening yet, and then when they don’t happen yet using that to publicly declare victory. When things actually do happen he’ll call it foul play by … Someone.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I have lost all faith in the American legal system. I expect Infowars to be broadcasting Jones’s filth well into the 2040s

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I will not be surprised if this ends with Jones winning his counter suit against the families and bankrupting them. I have lost all faith in the USA.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The point is not (necessarily) to ruin Jones and the people who work for him but to pay the creditors.

        In fact the court would have preferred NOT to ruin his company if possible. That was the point of chapter 11. But Jones seems hell bent on his own matrydom.