Doug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 hours agoHelp us pleaselemmy.worldimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1400arrow-down181
arrow-up1319arrow-down1imageHelp us pleaselemmy.worldDoug Holland@lemmy.worldM to AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 hours agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squareMontaggelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33arrow-down2·7 hours agoTweeted by someone that voted against ranked choice voting lol
minus-squareinvalid_name@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·4 hours agoNo. Nobody voted against ranked choice voting; it was never allowed to be an option.
minus-squareMontaggelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·4 hours agoNo, it was definitely voted down in my state
minus-squareinvalid_name@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·4 hours agoOh c…well at least it got that far. Its not like electoralism can get us out of this anyway.
minus-squarePhilipTheBucket@ponder.catlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 hour agoIt was on the ballot in well over 10% of jurisdictions, this past year. People voted it down.
Tweeted by someone that voted against ranked choice voting lol
No. Nobody voted against ranked choice voting; it was never allowed to be an option.
No, it was definitely voted down in my state
Oh c…well at least it got that far.
Its not like electoralism can get us out of this anyway.
It was on the ballot in well over 10% of jurisdictions, this past year. People voted it down.