Has anyone ever, yanno, just tried being its friend or give it therapy? No idea if it’d work, but testing X with SCP-682 is a running gag, wouldn’t hurt to try some therapy. Or maybe that’s part of the joke: the only way you could “neutralize” SCP-682 is by showing it empathy and compassion, but doing so is fundamentally incompatible with the SCP foundation.
I feel like I recall D-class personnel trying stuff like that occasionally with other SCPs. But then they either somehow fail, the Foundation terminates them for safety or to gauge the reaction from the SCP, or [REDACTED] and human contact is no longer permissible.
They did test letting 999 play with it. SCP-682 did seem to be “happy” but then once 999 was removed it woke up from its nap and killed many personal. Also while 999 seemed to want to play with it again 682 said “That feculent little [unintelligible] can [DATA EXPUNGED] and die." However it may actually consider SCP-079 a “friend” as close to a friend you could be with 682
Has anyone ever, yanno, just tried being its friend or give it therapy? No idea if it’d work, but testing X with SCP-682 is a running gag, wouldn’t hurt to try some therapy. Or maybe that’s part of the joke: the only way you could “neutralize” SCP-682 is by showing it empathy and compassion, but doing so is fundamentally incompatible with the SCP foundation.
I feel like I recall D-class personnel trying stuff like that occasionally with other SCPs. But then they either somehow fail, the Foundation terminates them for safety or to gauge the reaction from the SCP, or [REDACTED] and human contact is no longer permissible.
So actually, yeah, what you said.
They did test letting 999 play with it. SCP-682 did seem to be “happy” but then once 999 was removed it woke up from its nap and killed many personal. Also while 999 seemed to want to play with it again 682 said “That feculent little [unintelligible] can [DATA EXPUNGED] and die." However it may actually consider SCP-079 a “friend” as close to a friend you could be with 682