• balderdashOP
    3·
    1 year ago

    The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      5·
      1 year ago
      Your search query was found in the database.
Number of results: ∞
Results in alphabetical order:

The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)AAAAAAAA[...]

Showing results 1-10 (page 1 of ∞)

Results in order of appearance:

The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)gGT8c.Xk[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)nFP(gs20[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)IJ;zhA M[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)xrF4vCNb[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)9/?RyvCb[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)-PvL;pgY[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)O fFf3(R[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)PTZY78uU[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)Ejt-mS0_[...]
The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place)i1?HSiZ1[...]

Showing results 1-10 (page 1 of ∞)

Thank you for using HYPERWEBSTER™ services!
        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
          3·
          1 year ago

          Seriously, what were you expecting?

          The actual answer is Math.round(Math.PI**2,-21), which equals 0, and in fact, the monkey did write

          The square of pie (rounded at the sextillions place) is 0.

          Maybe you weren’t looking deep enough?