• solsangraalOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    by the “LaWs DoNt StoP cRiMiNaLs” logic, then we don’t need any laws at all, because whoever wants to is going to break them anyway. oh but of course the same chuds bleating this nonsense are also fighting tooth and nail to ram through bathroom laws. “only harming law abiding citizens” indeed

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Don’t lump me in with the trumptards. I voted Harris. I’m just stating facts.

      I have no doubt “the good christian” parents would have passed any gun laws or background checks you could throw at them.

      That little girl needed better parenting, mental healthcare and to not find a gun laying around.

      What new enforceable law could have prevented this?

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Guns are harder to buy = fewer guns sold = fewer guns made = fewer guns available for psychopaths, it’s really not hard at all

        You assuming these people would get around a background check based on absolutely nothing is not the rock-solid argument you think it is and it’s certainly not justification to continue to do nothing to stop people slaughtering toddlers.

      • solsangraalOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        it’s astounding to me, that there are still people well aware that there are many many countries without a severe constant school shooting problem because of gun control laws, and it’s still basically “we’ve tried nothing, and we’re all out of ideas!!!”