Democrats eye Harris 2028 presidential run as they devise political comeback
Party aides are confident in US vice-president’s ability to bounce back, including a bid for California governor emocratic party aides have begun to float ideas for a Kamala Harris political comeback, reportedly eyeing another run at the US’s highest office even as the party continues to grapple with the electoral messages contained in the vice-president’s decisive defeat in November’s White House race against Donald Trump.
Harris, who has reportedly not ruled out a second run for the presidency, is now reported to be considering a run for the California governorship, currently held until 2027 by Gavin Newsom. Newsom was a rumoured presidential contender during the chaotic summer that saw Joe Biden step down from a rematch with Trump – whom he defeated in the 2020 election – and then endorse Harris as his replacement.
According to the Washington Post on Monday, some Democratic party aides believe Trump – who, among other things, overcame a criminal conviction and other such charges to win – has sufficiently overturned the norms of losing White House candidates’ not attempting a second bite at the proverbial apple to give Harris the opportunity of a repeat bid in 2028, this time for the full cycle.
“Since Donald Trump has rewritten the rules – the norms – I don’t believe Kamala Harris or anyone should try to go with precedent, ever,” said Donna Brazile, a Harris ally, Al Gore 2000 presidential campaign manager and political commentator. “There are no rule books.”
Molly Murphy, a pollster who worked on the both the Biden and Harris campaigns, told the outlet: “The rules potentially don’t apply this time, and she still absolutely could have a mulligan because of the unique circumstances of this race and the candidate switch.
“But I don’t think it will be a given.”
The sentiment that Harris could make another bid for the White House comes as the Democratic party is sculpting an argument that her loss to Trump was not as comprehensive as has been popularly portrayed. She emerged from her three-month, $1.5bn campaign with higher approval ratings than she entered it, according to the political website 538, though she lost the electoral college 312-226 and became the first of three candidates to lose the popular vote to Trump.
“She is ending this race in a very different place than other nominees that have lost,” one Harris adviser told the outlet. “Her approval is higher. People were very happy with the race that she ran.”
Supporters further point to unequal political consequences for male and female candidates following a ballot box loss. Hillary Clinton did not attempt another run after losing to Trump in 2016, handing the Democratic torch to one-term president Biden.
Debbie Walsh, director of the center for American women and politics at Rutgers University, told the Post, “landing in general has kind of been harder for women”, noting that women who served at state level positions “don’t get the soft landing of a position in a law firm that allows them to regroup and earn some money and maybe run for something else. They struggle a bit.”
But as Harris considers her future – husband Doug Emhoff is returning to entertainment law – donors and supporters in California, where she served as a US senator and state attorney general, are pushing for a run for governor in 2026 to replace who would then be the outgoing, term-limited Newsom.
“The people that drove that conversation – within 18 minutes of the election being called – was the finance team,” one Harris confidante told the outlet.
If Harris, who beat Trump by 20 points in California, runs for and wins the governorship, she would become the nation’s first Black female governor, a considerable consolation prize.
But other Democrats are also considering both races. For president, Newsom as well as fellow governors JB Pritzker of Illinois and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan are said to be getting into position.
Harris campaign aides acknowledge the competition but say her name recognition, coupled with donors and experience as well as a conviction that she was dragged by Biden’s unpopularity, opens the starting gate for a comeback.
It’s almost Shakespearean that Joe Biden didn’t just kill his own campaign – he killed hers, too,” a Harris campaign adviser told the Post.
Meanwhile, California congresswoman Katie Porter, a potential state governor candidate, diplomatically told the outlet: “I am certain that everyone will want to support Kamala Harris in continuing to serve this country.”
Harris herself has not revealed her thinking but is said to be “processing” her loss and plans to “stay in the fight”.
“The fight that fueled our campaign – a fight for freedom and opportunity – that did not end on November 5,” Harris said on a call with donors and supporters in November.
Harris ultimately used the word “fight” 19 times during that call.
Harris, who has reportedly not ruled out a second run for the presidency
Memoryholing 2020, when she was one of the leest favorite ghouls
If they didn’t run Clinton again, I doubt they’ll rerun an even bigger loser who managed to lose the popular vote by millions
Will Bloomberg throw another billion to firewall against reforms again?
They realise that they only got so much funding because of Trump, right? Not Harris? That next time they won’t get nearly as much support because Trump won’t be running. It’s like they’re so disconnected from reality that they can only look at meaningless graphs and charts to determine their decisions.
The democrats must want to lose at this point
We’re living in a parody at this point, and I am dead inside
This is too funny.
Alexa! What’s the definition of insanity?
There is no fucking way
They just refuse to learn.
and we all pay the price for it.
She would get absolutely wrecked in a primary with Newsom, Whitmer, and any randoms who just by virtue of having a pulse, are more charismatic in their pinky toes than dull dishrag Harris.
Just like Clinton in 2016, Biden in 2020 and 2024? Primaries are blatant farce.
I bow to your simple retelling of real life recent history. Goddamn what a shit 12 years of off-putting Democrat presidential candidates
Also
though she lost the electoral college 312-226 and became the first of three candidates to lose the popular vote to Trump.
Is this from the future? Who are the other 2 candidates?
Those unidentified drones bring election results from the future. Thought you knew.
Hillary in 2016 and Biden in 2020.
I am a fool
but Biden won the popular vote in 2020
Yeah, Hillary, Biden, and Kamala were the three candidates who have ran against Trump, and Kamala was the first and only one to lose the popular vote.
ah fuck I was reading it wrong. sorry
THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION OF YOUR LIFE. BLOMPF WILL END ELECTIONS. DEMOCRACY WILL BE DEAD AND AMERICA WILL BE OVER. YOU WILL ALL DIE, BE PUT INTO GAY CONCENTRATION CAMPS, OR BE FORCED TO BIRTH BABIES FOR THE WORKFORCE IF DRUMPF WINS anyway c ya vote for me next time tho thx
Lmao