A study that stoked enthusiasm for the now-disproven idea that a cheap malaria drug can treat COVID-19 has been retracted — more than four-and-a-half years after it was published.

… Its eventual withdrawal, on the grounds of concerns over ethical approval and doubts about the conduct of the research, marks the 28th retraction for co-author Didier Raoult, a French microbiologist, formerly at Marseille’s Hospital-University Institute Mediterranean Infection (IHU), who shot to global prominence in the pandemic. French investigations found that he and the IHU had violated ethics-approval protocols in numerous studies, and Raoult has now retired.

“Why it took more than four-and-a-half years after the study was initially published for the journal to come to this conclusion is not clear. It is also somewhat surprising that most of the paper’s authors still stand by study’s findings and conclusions despite its obvious inconsistencies, methodological flaws and potential ethical issues as outlined in the retraction note,” says Søgaard.

The paper (now marked as retracted): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    ·
    8 days ago

    The paper linking vaccines with autism was also retracted, and that didn’t stop them.

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    More proof that hydroxychloroquine is a miracle drug and the lizard people just don’t want us to know about it.

    • chuymatt@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I mean, it is an awesome drug! I use it a lot. Even in covid suffers - when COVID activates an autoimmune disease.

      Let’s do ivermectin next! I’ll go first: fantastic for endo and ectoparasites, and even a subset of folks with rosacea. Does jack all for Covid infections.

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Agree… So many people are so far gone from logic that anything and everything either proves them right or is a conspiracy. Guess free education is important in a society that wants to remain just this… A society of people living and functioning together. We are entering the “find out” phase

  • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 days ago

    I still don’t get why the higher ups pushed this and Ivermectin so hard. Like, they clearly aren’t anti big pharma, so it must be someone getting their beak wet. But who?

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you remember the time, Trump was pushing for any narrative that could let him say COVID wasn’t a big deal and would just disappear. He was looking for easy answers.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah that’s the problem with people in leadership roles. They should know better than to think complex problems have easy solutions.

          Unfortunately, a lot of the voting public gravitate towards the leaders that assure them there are easy answers. The average person doesn’t want to hear a nuanced answer to a complex issue.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      You want a conspiracy theory?

      It was designed to make any criticism of big pharma look crazy.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Which it also didn’t do. Nobody “trusts” “big Pharma”. They trust doctors, scientists, and the regulatory bodies that oversee them.

    • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      They wanted you to go back to work, not in X months if and when a vaccine was available, but tomorrow, taking some bullshit drug if you needed reassurance. While they were happy working from home, triple vaxxed and double masked.

      I don’t know what the intent was, only what it achieved. It is now political suicide to enforce public health mandates, so when the next pandemic hits, your boss will be able to force you to go to work in unsafe sanitary conditions and a lot of people will be cheering for it.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    The damage is done. The conspiracy nuts will just believe that the all mysterious “they” are trying to hide research.

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    It did what it needed to.

    Now that the damage is done, they can pretend to have integrity again to convince people to believe them when they publish the next “miracle study”.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        They were remarkably fast for a vaccine, they were effective and also the most unpleasant vaccine I’ve had. And they involved the industrialized world dumping huge amounts of resources into their creation. They also took significantly longer than the study proposing hydrocychloroquine. The study refuting it wasn’t on a timer so it was able to take it slow and go at the pace of normal science.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, but also we were incredibly lucky that most of the technology already existed. If covid happened 5 years prior, we would not have those vaccines.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    Why is it that people sneer at non-medical doctors? Far more fraud is committed by the bois with stethoscopes around their shoulders. People be falling for that bedside rizz and getting played like a fiddle.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve never seen people sneer at doctors of physics talking about physics or doctors of medieval literature discussing the influences on chaucer (though they do get routinely mocked for thinking themselves employable).

      What people do sneer at is doctors of electrical engineering claiming that they’ve disproven speciation by evolution and doctors of law declaring medical establishment wrong about medicine.

      A doctorate just means you’re an expert at something not everything

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        A medical doctor is a well regarded and well numerated profession. They are pillars of society. They are trusted and revered in a way that teachers rarely are. The status of a doctor in the field of computer science or engineering is not much more than someone with a common or garden degree. Nobody knows what a research question is or how science is advanced. Everyone knows House and Grays Anatomy. Fuck those fake doctors with their models and predictive power. We don’t revere truth tellers, we revere celebrity. We want dat bedside rizz. That’s how Dr Shipman killed us. That’s why Professor Nutt was fired from his post.