Typically, I define the Weird West genre to be movies that take place in the Wild West and include some supernatural element. This usually means some sort of horror element like vampires or zombies, but that isn’t really a requirement. So a movie with cowboys and dinosaurs fits my definition, even though it isn’t really what I picture when I think of Weird West.

Yes, it has legendary Ray Harryhausen’s stop-motion action, but the whole movie just seems silly to me. I don’t know, I guess I’d call this one “Weird West, but I don’t care to watch it”.

Here’s a trailer. I don’t think it’s streaming anywhere right now though.

  • JonTheKnight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’ve always loved the idea of Weird West. I don’t know if there is a widely accepted “definition” of Weird West but for me it’s almost anything that breaks the Wild West tropes or setting in any fantastical/absurd way. All of this to say I would put this in the Weird West category in my own personal interpretation.

    TLDR: In my personal opinion, any significant addition of scifi/fantasy/absurdist things to break the Wild West mold is Weird West. So yes, I see it as Weird West.

    • JerichoCrossOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I know it’s pointless to argue semantics about genre definitions but I do enjoy discussing the boundaries of where one genre ends and another begins.

      While I won’t argue Valley of Gwangi is Weird West since it has dinosaurs, do you think subverting Western tropes is enough to make something Weird West? I mean, The Quick and The Dead plays pretty loose with the laws of physics just to make for some fun shots:

      Or there’s Western comedies like Blazing Saddles and Maverick that subvert a lot of Western tropes. I guess I’d almost define Weird West as whether or not something could happen in the West (even though it obviously didn’t). So inclusion of vampires, monsters, dinosaurs are “obviously” Weird West but a Western where the “monsters” are simply cannibals isn’t Weird West to me. Of course, there’s also the sub-genre of Acid Western where things might get super weird but not in a supernatural way. And this is why I like making these posts, to discuss the fringes of the genre.

      • JonTheKnight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No, just a subverting of tropes isn’t Weird West to me. As I said, it has to be significant. Something that implies much larger implications to the setting/world. Examples: steampunk tech, some alien/scifi tech, magic users, fantasy creatures, etc.

        Even better for me is if it feels like a seamless addition. Like if everything about the town is a standard Wild West town but is also a low magic setting where some heirlooms have enchantments or a magic user is uncommon but not strange.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I remember watching old Gene Autry episodes or movies on pbs on Sunday mornings and there being some wild stuff in them. I was young (5 or 6) so I do not have specific memories, but I do remember thinking this is weird.