Landmark legislation sees the Australian government committed to the novel step of child protection by banning social media for under sixteens.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If they don’t have an online presence and neither do their peers, how would they be cyber bullied?

    I’m sure bullying will go on, old school, in the streets, but cyber bullying is one of the things that will go away with this

    I think this is great. There are about one or two generations worth of people that had social media while being kids and I think they should stop acting as if it’s the end of the world if it would go away. I fully understand that you grew up with it and don’t know any netter but believe you me: you can do without, you can survive without, you will be better without.

    Go outside, touch grass, have fun, be a kid again.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      If they don’t have an online presence and neither do their peers, how would they be cyber bullied?

      Fun fact, I was called by my bullies on my parents landline and bullied when I was a kid in the 1980s.

      Bullies are gonna bully - the method varies but never the motive.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I grew up before the internet dude. I just don’t underestimate the cleverness and resourcefulness of young people.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      If you think this is going to actually stop kids from getting on social media, I have a bridge to sell you.

      All it’s going to do is push kids to hide their social media apps, which they’ll get either through a VPN or faking the ID check, which gives parents even less visibility into what’s going on with their children online.

    • bigschnitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      A few years ago the Australian government spent an enormous amount of money on a proposed firewall to protect the children. After years of development they were ready to pilot test their white elephant, and discovered that, on average, the Australian 12 year old could bypass it in ten minutes.

      It’s unlikely that the government could even enforce an obstacle as robust as the “are you 18+” checkbox that porn sites opt in to. This new law will not have any influence on under 16s online presence.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m an Australian, and I don’t remember the ‘firewall’ that you’re talking about. Do you have a link or something to remind me?

        • bigschnitz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This is the first result from Google. It’s I guess ancient history now being it was the labor rights push to (probably) unintentionally discredit kevin07, but internal politics aside Conroy (famous for his opposition to adult rating for videogames) was for aong time a candidate for ‘biggest piece of shit in Australian politics’. Stephen Conroy was the face of it, so search for him and firewall to your hearts content. The Alana and Madeline foundation were involved in some of the testing that damned the project, if I remember right (as if common since hadn’t already damned it with seconds of the sales pitch).