According to nearly a dozen retired officers and current military lawyers, as well as scholars who teach at West Point and Annapolis, an intense if quiet debate is underway inside the U.S. military community about what orders it would be obliged to obey if President-elect Donald Trump decides to follow through on his previous warnings that he might deploy troops against what he deems domestic threats, including political enemies, dissenters and immigrants.

Archived at https://archive.is/He9O6

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    66
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ah, so it’s not relevant at all because it’s literally not even based on our own universe…

    Thanks!

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s a hypothetical scenario on a military warship in space with refugees in tow.

      Also, it’s not even praising the police, just stating its purpose.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        9 hours ago

        it’s not even praising the police, just stating its purpose

        Maybe in that universe…

        In ours “serve and protect” was never what the police were for, it was just a PR slogan they put in cruisers

        That’s what I’m talking about, our universe is not the same, although you seem to not be sure about how our universe works…

        If not youd see why the quote isn’t applicable.

    • Pheonixdown@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Science Fiction is largely used as an allegory to explore the real human condition in a way that is parallel to political and cultural topics of the day without the inherent baggage that people would bring to exploring the real topic.

      While the original quote and topic is about deploying a military as a policing force, it actually also holds true in the reverse as well, as policing forces shift towards an adversarial militarization against their community, leading directly to the issues you raised in the first comment about the failure of them to live up to the “protect and serve” motto.

      While fictional events aren’t real, they are written by real people with views, desires and goals. Good writers will have internal consistency for their characters and try to ensure their external interactions have the authenticity of the ring of truth, because that’s how people will relate to the characters and story.

      Good fiction is just a random meaningless story, it’s a platform for education and safe exploration of the real human condition.

      • IamSparticles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Also, just to add some context for the specific example of Battlestar Galactica: the show premiered in 2004. The 9/11 attacks were still fresh in peoples’ minds. Congress had passed the Patriot Act giving law enforcement and intelligence services new directives to surveil and police US citizens and look for signs of future terrorist plots. We were entrenched in two new wars, and there were lots of protests. There were scandals involving the president and his advisors misleading the public about the nature and quality of intelligence they had.

        The plot and themes of B:G were a direct response to all of this. The idea of martial law being declared and rights being suspended was not some far-fetched idea the show writers were playing with. People were really concerned that it might happen to squash public unrest.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, but in the real America police have literally never had “serve and protect” as part of their duties…

        It was just a PR slogan.

        Invalidating the whole analogy.

        It’s just not relevant, and I’m sorry I can’t communicate that in a way you can grok

        • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Good thing you’ll never read 1984, or animal farm, or brave new world, or anything by P.K. Dick, because, yep, completely irrelevant.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No idea why you would make that assumption…

            Or why you think that would be meaningful to the discussion…

            Just sounds like a bad attempt at an insult which resulted in demonstrating ignorance. If that was your goal, then well done.