• Kerred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have electric though. Worst case is the pollutants gone into the mining of the lithium and manufacturing of the vehicle. But how much of that can be controlled for mining and manufacturing?

      • AmberPrince@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a bad take. The EPA has a list already made because these lies keep going around. It is better for the environment through out the entire life cycle of a car, from raw material mining and processing to manufacturing and use, to be Electric than use an Internal Combustion Engine.

        • twiked@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is less bad, but still pollutes a lot, especially in countries with high-carbon electricity production.

          • AmberPrince@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure. But the guy above me is implying that at worst, EVs pollute more, and at best, the two are just the same in terms of pollutants.

            The reality is harm reduction. It would be better to take a train or bus than drive any car. Better still would be to ride a bike, even better would be to just walk. But that is not feasible. Instead we just do what we can and make marginally better choices.

            Don’t let perfect get in the way of good. We’re after incremental changes.

            • twiked@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oops, didn’t catch that part from the parent comment. You’re right, it breaks even in most if not all cases.

              A side note : EVs are and will be needed for a long time, but an important reduction of personal vehicle use will be needed as well. Shifting the same usage to EVs will surely not be sufficient.

      • Electric_leprechaun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Many cars are charged from solar or from renewable energy. You look at the environmental costs of extracting and refining oil, storing it, the carbon cost of shipping it and then driving it to its final destination via HGV to the fuel station. It then had to be electrically pumped from the ground into your car then you burn it off back into the atmosphere for everyone to breathe back in again. The lithium comes from the same mines used to make the phone battery you are reading this message from. The EV battery will live much longer than your ICE car as it can be almost totally recycled and end of life or used as storage for home battery systems.

    • yousir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Worst case is all the power you use to charge comes from dirty sources. Over the lifetime of the car it might never break equal with an ICE car in emissions