Remember when NFTs sold for millions of dollars? 95% of the digital collectibles are now probably worthless.::NFTs had a huge bull run two years ago, with billions of dollars per month in trading volume, but now most have crashed to zero, a study found.

  • LexiMax@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I buy a lot of baseball cards for 1 cent, at least they don’t suffer from the oracle paradox.

    NFT’s were nakedly a solution in search of a problem that weren’t even a very good solution to the problem they were purporting to solve. That’s what pisses people off.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, I tried to understand this Oracle Paradox you’re talking about but every explanation I found had so much jargon that it fried my brain at the third line. Do you know where can I find an ELI5?

      And yes, I get why people dislike the concept of NFTs, but mocking their value (or lack thereof) seems dumb when it’s “obtained” the same way as pretty much every other collectible.

      • LexiMax@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Essentially, the NFT is “proof of ownership” only insofar as what is put into the blockchain is correct and accurately reflects reality.

        If you don’t vet what goes on the blockchain for accuracy, the blockchain is useless, and if you do validate, you don’t need a blockchain because the validator can just use a traditional database.

        It is a solution in search of a problem.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So it’s a matter of being relatively easy to scam people with it? Is it an issue only when the NFT is “made” for the first time or for every transaction too?

          I personally thought the appeal was that you can sell them as regular items, whereas if they were in a traditional database you still would’ve needed the transaction to be approved by the database itself.

          At least that’s what I figured, I know nothing of how selling an NFT works so I could be just talking out of my ass.

          • LexiMax@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So it’s a matter of being relatively easy to scam people with it?

            That is merely a side-effect of one of the original sins of programmable blockchains - the fact that there is a delegation of responsibility of data management from a database administrator to whoever happens to have control of that data, and the controller can only manage that data according to the underlying code of the NFT.

            This only sounds appealing if you’ve never actually touched a database in your life. There are too many points of failure, and said mistakes are much harder to correct.

      • Honytawk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_that_I_know_nothing

        This saying is connected with the answer to a question Socrates is said to have posed to the Pythia, the Oracle of Delphi, in which the oracle stated something to the effect of “Socrates is the wisest person in Athens.”[3]

        Socrates, believing the oracle but also completely convinced that he knew nothing, was said to have concluded that nobody knew anything, and that he was only wiser than others because he was the only person who recognised his own ignorance.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now I’m even more confused. How does that have anything to do with NFTs?