• Jolteon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    All nuclear waste ever produced could be safely stored in less than a square mile (Plus a radius around that to prevent idiots tampering with it). The safety issues of it are greatly over exaggerated most of the time. The problem with that, is that storing nuclear waste safely is relatively (though not extremely) expensive.

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Doesn’t increasing the concentration of nuclear waste make it’s effects much more dangerous?

      And sorry to pick for more info, but what’s the volume of waste in that one square mile?

      • Jolteon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Technically yes, but practically no for the first question. Properly stored nuclear waste has very minimal radiation leakage.

        As for the second, it’s complicated. The actual amount of radioactive waste is less than 10,000 cubic meters. There’s quite a bit more than that of just water that has become toxic due to radiation, but the storage requirements of that are much lower. Here’s a rough infographic: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-all-the-nuclear-waste-in-the-world/

        Also, while The low level waste would still fit in a single square mile if you were restricted to that, using natural caves is a lot cheaper and easier than building tanks, so it’s not exactly a realistic solution.

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Thanks for the detailed reply.

          So basically it’s as safe as you trust the fail rate to be. Which isn’t super risky, provided you can trust your construction.