• Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is bold but actually in a way I think it has a possibility of happening cause Microsoft will figure they can make money from it

  • Uncut_Lemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This won’t happen, there is a lot of industrial software that digs it’s fingers deep into windows subsystems that wine does not support. Even popular commercial, like adobe, cannot run on wine correctly

    At this point I’m not even sure Microsoft knows how some of those sub systems work, they just migrating ancient code bases and patching it enough to make it work again on the new compilers.

    So windows kernel will exist untill everyone else leaves.

    Move your workflow away from windows, if you can, as Microsoft doesn’t care enough about their userbase.

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is why there’s still Windows XP running major systems.

      Windows kept changing anyway so maybe it’s possible that’ll still happen and people just get left with legacy OSs

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If Windows becomes a Linux distro that might save their share in normal desktop usage.

    So I don’t see it happening.

    They don’t care about their users.

  • ramblingsteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I think it will become an entirely cloud based OS with a thin client booting the machine straight into their Edge browser. Pay as you go operating system that never leaves their Azure walled garden. Google’s Chromebooks were just ahead of their time. As Spock said: “it’s Linux Jim, but not as we know it”.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s a Jon Lajoie song called “Radio Friendly Song”. There’s a moment in that cong where he’s describing the (as of 15 years ago) modern trend of radio friendly songs being the same garbage every song. And the feeling one has thinking that every time a new song is released you would think the general public would eventually reject the same 4 cord note progression in every song. Then, he belts out a line that I wish were isolated, and could becomd a meme onto itself. He’s singing about how you would think the public wojld eventually reject these songs, and follows that up with “BUT YOU WERE WROOOONG!!!”

    And I hear that line everytime someone says something blatently wrong, I hear just that line of the song. I wish it were on youtube, isolated so a 3 second soundbyte so I could just post it when I see something like that.

    Because readkng you say that Microsoft in 2025 will turn Windows into a Linux distro…

    “But you were wrooooong!!!”

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So animals evolve towards being crabs, operating systems evolve towards being linux distros?

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Yeah that’s not going to happen.

    However, I think Windows will become more and more tied to the Microsoft cloud offerings.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Very much this. I can see one potential future Microsoft product being something that is to be installed on a thin client PC sold to consumers for cheap. It will run not much more than a browser in which all apps will load from Microsoft servers, and all storage will be on the Microsoft cloud. And if you miss a monthly payment they’ll basically hold all your files for ransom until you start paying again.

      I can practically hear the Microsoft execs making some very unsavoury noises about that idea.

      As for (admittedly somewhat weak) proof they’re headed in this direction: Wordpad is a useful small program that would easily fit onto a thin client and there’d be room for documents created by it on the limited storage available. It has to have some storage for browser cache after all.

      Wordpad was recently cancelled, and users urged to use Word instead. Which is not free of (further) cost like Wordpad was.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s not too far from Windows S edition. That more closely mimics the smartphone model, but still allows the Windows app store.

        Wordpad is much more easily explained: They don’t want to maintain it anymore, since that costs money. It was also cannibalizing sales of Word, and often left users frustrated. Frankly, it’s weird that they maintained it as long as they did.

        Now, solitaire becoming a subscription, that’s a blatant cash grab.

        • palordrolap@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          They could have just renamed it. Wordpad’s Win3.11 predecessor was called “Write”, for example, so that name could have been revived.

          For a long time, write.exe still existed and all it did was launch Wordpad, so they’d only have to reverse that.

          They could also have chosen another name entirely. Or, since they’ve recently added a bunch of unnecessary crap to Notepad, they might as well have merged the two.

          “Confusion” is merely an excuse.

          • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I never said confusion, nor did I say it had anything to do with the name. WordPad development takes time and money with minimal return. It also provides a very minimal subset of the capabilities of Word. People expecting Word capabilities are frustrated by the limitations of WordPad, and are actually happier being told it’s simply not available without additional purchase.

            • palordrolap@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It’s a rich text box with a few controls to enable or disable those features at certain points in the text. The whole thing was entirely built from components used elsewhere in the OS, or at least the earlier versions were. One competent employee could manage it in an afternoon; a week at the outside. If Microsoft has let it get so ridiculously bloated that it’s now unmanageable by one person, that’s on them.

              I never said confusion

              People expecting Word capabilities

              Now, why would they expect that?

              See also: Java and JavaScript.

    • 474D@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Truly feel the ultimate goal is to make Windows itself a subscription model

  • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t think they would bother doing that much work at the core of the operating system. They are too busy playing with the UI and cloud integrations they don’t care about the algorithms the kernel runs on and they have a better driver situation currently anyway. I don’t see the route to this.