military members should be bullied. when one walks into your place of business and asks for a military discount say count dis dick

  • MidnightPocket [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You’re both right.

    Drug-dealing is a crime against the working class and the Chinese socialists along with the Black Panthers were so negatively impacted that they had no tolerance for it in their revolutionary praxis.

    That doesn’t mean that a petty dealer deserves the same ire as US military members. If that were the case, every convenience store clerk is also an agent of reaction and death. Maybe you were specifically talking about opium? Even still, the other poster was also being bombastic rather than writing a thesis.

    • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I’m a little confused by this response, I never said a drug dealer deserves the same ire as the foot soldiers of imperialism, just that they can serve the same purpose to the imperialists in the domestic sphere. Not sure what the convience store clerk example has to do with this and I wasn’t specifically talking about opium, crack is an upper but served the same purpose as heroin or opium

        • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You don’t think there’s a distinction between alcohol’s penetration into all American communities and the targeted attacks against the black community by planted narcotics?

          Also could you address the rest of my comment? Thx

          • MidnightPocket [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I don’t know what the current disagreement is, especially given that my comment centrally agreed with both you and the other commenter. I just pointed out that you were talking past each other in an unproductive manner.

            You don’t think there’s a distinction between alcohol’s penetration into all American communities and the targeted attacks against the black community by planted narcotics?

            As you claim, it is just a difference of scope. The Quote which constitutes most of your comment, at least without further context, doesn’t seem to be stressing the discriminatory drug sales but rather the pernicious nature of drug sales.