Phyllis Fong, a 22-year veteran of the department, had earlier told colleagues that she intended to stay after the White House terminated her on Friday, saying that she didn’t believe the administration had followed proper protocols, the sources said.

In an email to colleagues on Saturday, reviewed by Reuters, she said the independent council of the inspectors general on integrity and efficiency “has taken the position that these termination notices do not comply with the requirements set out in law and therefore are not effective at this time”.

  • bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump bilked the courts for years. Tying them up to great effect. Why don’t we do it back?

      • laranis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        One very simple reason. How are court decisions ultimately enforced? By police, with force. Even if you win in court what police or federal agency will stand against the administration? None. Why? Fear of retaliation. Which is the same thing I’d be thinking if I was considering making a court case against Trump. The math is simple: stand up against a broken system and put a target on your back or sit down quietly and hope they don’t come for your family. This will be happening in many people’s minds. I hope I’d have the courage to stand up like this person did, but honestly I don’t know. Guess it depends on how bad it gets.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      because we want a working functioning government and not just to fuck things up. Tying up the courts just mucks everything up.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I don’t see use ever going back to something “normal” without first tearing everything down first. Either from internal or external means. Things have only been getting worse since I’ve been politically aware.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Which I guess is why palestine will soon be at something normal. Nope. Tearying everything down is not a good way to go. Please give me a historical example of everything being torn down resulting in a better result. Sure you can look at how some power went down and another better one eventually became the norm but that is over decades and centuries and often different parts of the world. Things do not work that way.

          • drthunder@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Not having to tear things down would be great, but how do we do that at this point? The president is above the law, and has Congress, the courts, cops, a newly-freed legion of brownshirts, and an actual cult on his side. His party’s been getting away with ratfucking elections for at least 25 years.

            I certainly think we can tear things down nonviolently, but we’re out of ways to do this politely. I don’t know how we get past the right-wing propaganda machine or government not being very democratic in the first place. We need to hugely expand the House, get rid of the Senate, and limit federal judge terms at the very least, and none of those are going to happen as long as the federal government is stacked in fascists’ favor. The last meaningful amendment was passed in 1971.

            • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              well one way is to not allow the worse option that is pushing our worst things to win elections at all. This could be done if everyone who does not like their ways would actually just consistently vote against them at every level. Tearing things down means no support for anything. We have to fight things in the courts and at the ballot box and on the streets. Heck luigi showed a pretty good thing to. There are not all that many that need to go and we don’t want to destroy poor neighborhoods to get things done.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I never said that it’s a good way, but every democrat that gets elected does nothing to pull back the overreach of the previous republican.

            Please give me a historical example of everything being torn down resulting in a better result.

            Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. Guess what those two regimes have in common with the current US government.

            If we don’t do something internally, the US government is going to go to war with the good guys.

            • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              both of those examples were basically rebuilt by the us. that is an anomaly and what is the society that is going to rebuild us better even if it were to happen again? What happened to germany when after ww1 when an outside force did not guide its rebuild? This is not something anyone should want.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                I want to have concentration camps less then I want to be invaded by Europe and have my government rebuilt. On a personal level, this government has done me dirty and I owe it nothing.

                • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  yeah im not saying being rebuilt better is not something that would be great but more who is going to do that or is in a position to do that. its just not something that is going to happen regardless of what we may want.