• JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The workers didn’t need to strike. Costco is notoriously an amazing employer to work for. They have some of the lowest turnover in the industry. The CEO often gets grilled in earnings calls on things like employee costs and he always rebuts that happy employees are productive. I am very pro unions but this is one of those examples of a good employer.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Thats a bit disingenuous. The workers DID have to threaten to strike. This raise didnt just come out of the blue as a benevolent gesture.

        But this is how give and take should work with employers.

        • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I hadn’t heard that but with more research, you are correct: they had to threaten a strike. I am disappointed to hear that.

          • Delphia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’m not that disappointed, its the reality of the system we have. Even senior management have to protect their jobs. They resisted just enough to be able to sell to the shareholders “Did you want a strike? Did you want workers picketing? You want those optics?”

            The system we have sucks, thats undeniable. But this is just the process.