Meredith Whittaker reaffirms that Signal would leave UK if forced by privacy bill | TechCrunch
techcrunch.com
Meredith Whittaker, the president of the Signal Foundation, the organization that maintains the Signal messaging app, spoke about the U.K.'s controversial new privacy bill at TC Disrupt 2023.

Meredith Whittaker reaffirms that Signal would leave UK if forced by privacy bill::Meredith Whittaker, the president of the Signal Foundation, the organization that maintains the Signal messaging app, spoke about the U.K.'s controversial new privacy bill at TC Disrupt 2023.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.spaceEnglish
    5·
    9 months ago

    There’s a difference between the spooks being able to read everyone’s messages and the ordinary police being able to do so. Assuming that Five Eyes or similar have a secret way of decrypting Signal messages, it won’t remain a secret if every drug dealer who uses Signal is swiftly arrested. (Even with the trick of parallel construction, postal inspectors magically getting lucky every time someone uses Signal would get suspicious pretty quickly.) If the spooks can read your Signal messages, they are compelled to ration that capability rather than burning it.

    • jet@hackertalks.comEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      Agreed 100%. So I think signal matches most people’s threat models, so it’s still great to recommend to people.

      If you were running some countries internal messaging service for diplomats. You might use signal, but you’d have to mirror the infrastructure to completely host it. And then probably add your own ciphers on top.

      All down to the threat model.