• TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I really can’t even conceptualize how anyone can be so ignorant that they actually believed these evil morons would do anything to lower grocery prices.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    He’s just doing all of the shit that actual legislators who need to be reelected don’t dare to do. he’s not a politician and he doesn’t care. He’s canceled already, so he’s invulnerable. Republicans love him and there’s no way he’s getting “fired”

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    Elon’s playing capitalist Jenga with the last guardrail protecting peasants from loan sharks. Shocking. The CFPB’s $20B consumer clawback merely proves how systemic the grift is – that number’s a rounding error compared to Wall Street’s annual looting spree. Libertarians always rage against the one regulator occasionally doing its job while ignoring the Fed’s permanent corporate welfare spigot.

    Billionaire death cultists want us to believe consumer protections hinder “innovation.” Translation: letting payday lenders algorithmically repo kidneys would boost GDP. Democracy’s just the AI-generated hologram masking oligarchy’s firmware update.

  • MagicShel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you think about it, costs might go down overall, but the difference will be made up by less educated/aware folks getting raked over the coals by predatory practices. It’s a step towards a more Darwinian society.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would be Darwinian if the predatory practices hurt “less fit” people the most. And that would be evil in itself, and also detrimental to society. However, they will just hurt poor people, which is most people, as companies will just go “what are you going to do, sue us?”

      • MagicShel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s what I meant, but maybe I wasn’t specific enough. In modern society, wealth is what makes you more fit for survival.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The problem is that this will just hurt 99.99% of people. Wealth is not a good selector because it has practically no gradient. Pretty much nobody but a very select few have enough wealth to combat this.

          I’m saying that it’s like you went into a zoo and started randomly shooting the animals there and called it a selection pressure. Nothing will adapt to survive bullet wounds, they will just die.

          • MagicShel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Preaching to the choir, my friend. I’m not supportive of this in any way.

            • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I guess I’m just saying that even if someone is into social Darwinism and eugenics and stuff like that - which pretty much makes one a Nazi - even then, this is stupid.