• Rusty@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, Putin invaded Ukraine on the premise that people need protection from Ukrainian government.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s an insult to Putin.

      Putin is at least like a clever bully. Trump is more like a toddler holding an uzi.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I am going to say this every comment.

    Stop sending the US oil. Stop sending natural gas. Stop sending electricity. Stop sending steel and aluminum. Stop sending them rare earths. Stop sending them wood. Do it immediately. Do it now.

    We will see who needs who.

    Yes, this would cause economic pain in Canada. So will not doing it.

    Everything above is in demand all over the world.

    Frankly, every other county should attend a summit next month where we ALL agree to stop sending the US anything and stop buying anything from the US.

    If America wants to isolate themselves, I say let’s go!!

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      If you completely block all those things you practically guarantee they invade us for “national security”.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      The double edged sword of international trade, we all sink and swim together. Last time the US had an economic recession, it was felt worldwide. The last time the US had a depression WW2 happened.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        There’s an old saying that when the USA sneezes, the world catches cold. What happens when it’s got syphillis and starts fucking everybody?

      • lotmo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Right a reasonable human would understand that but we are talking about Trump here. Most of the stuff he’s doing WILL hurt the global economy but until it starts hurting his bottom line all’s fair game to him. Same way he’s testing the waters in his own country in respect with laws.

    • shawn1122@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Not easy to find a new buyer overnight. The lost revenue would be devastating to the Canadian economy.

      Selling things to the US is essentially the foundation of the Canadian economy.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    7 days ago

    What are we in danger of? Having too many resources that don’t belong to the US? I’m waiting for someone to wake up and realize the third time’s the charm so we can stop having to entertain this idiot.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      How precise are Canada’s targeting systems? I don’t want a war with you guys because my idiot president will carpet bomb your cities…you could theoretically end this whole fiasco in 3-5 preemptive missile strikes…just putting that out there if anyone has the keys

      • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s much easier for someone on the inside to do it. Less political and the successor won’t feel obligated to start/continue a war. It’s why America sends the CIA to Venezuela (et al) instead of missiles.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        We just need to stop sending oil and electricity. The looting and riots should take care of the rest.

        Then we can launch a “peacekeeping” mission to the US. Those are our specialty.

  • arockinyourshoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why is it every time I hear this shitstain-tan asshole go on about taking my country, all I can think of is the British of 1812 burning down the White House and a passing thought of “hang on now…”

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      So if you go to Washington,
      Its buildings clean and nice

      EDIT: Seriously, though, the last time a fascist regime had their capital burned it only made the fascists stronger. You can use the imagery of a burning White House to keep yourself motivated while you participate in the boycott of American products and services and engage in other activities to help the Canadian economy weather the upcoming storm, but actually trying to burn the place would just make things worse.

      This should go without saying but this is Lemmy, after all.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    How far off of “We have to liberate Americans in Canada from tyrannical French-Canadian rule” are we?

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Trump next week: We need to invade Canada…they need help…they are forced to learn languages there, things they buy have a language on it nobody can learn… Its terrible

  • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    The United States will happily supply all the weapons our oldest ally, Canada, needs for this battle of survival against the tyrannical forces of the United States. Will you be paying with cash, credit, layaway, or mineral rights to all your natural resources?

  • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    If that stupid kid hadn’t flinched we wouldn’t be in the universe where Kirk and Spock go back and find a Nazi America.

  • vastard@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m not expecting Trudeau to respond to stupid shit like this but he’s been pretty silent this week. I’m hoping that means he has some trade deals to announce.

    The good news about global tariff threats is that it would be really easy to find allies that would match responding tariffs made against our exports or diverting required resources away from that orange fuck.

    • Snowstorm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Responding in a slow pace is a feature not a bug : the toddler in chief will get bored and might go get is dopamine with another target, while we redirect export elsewhere

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Harper came out to say that worst case if he was in Trudeau’s position he would have just dealt with the bad economy for a few years until Trump gets replaced.

      (Edit: my opinion from here) Introduce help measures like during COVID (some form of UBI) and regulations to prevent banks from seizing the property of those losing their job due to the tariffs and yeah we would end up with more debt as a country, but we would keep our sovereignty.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m sorry, Harper talked about UBI and banking regulations? The right honourable Stephen Harper? The one who had to be dragged, kicking and screaming by his own caucus, to respond to the 2008 crisis with anything other than austerity?

        That Harper?

        Wow.

        • nyan@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Priorities. If there’s no longer a Canada, then he doesn’t get to style himself “the Right Honourable” anymore.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Nah, just the first part, the second part is the logical thing to do if we decide to just tough it up! I’ve made it clearer in my previous post.

      • DrDickHandler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        My guy, Republicans aren’t going anywhere in 4 years. Canada is part of their goal and they will not stop. The Oligarchs want it and don’t want to pay for it. They don’t care if both economies suffer in the process because they have ways to profit out of it.

  • Adrius@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Canada has underfunded its military for decades. Now that we have a powerful neighbour talking about anexing us, we really should start funding it more.

  • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Who do we need protection from? The only nation that’s openly threatening Canada’s sovereignty is the one claiming we need their protection from.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    I am pretty close to the Canada border, and every day is bringing new curve balls that make it harder to tell if it would be safer to stay or go. 🙀

    • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean it varies on the areas, safety from fascist takeovers is ranked from lowest to highest: blue states < Canada < Europe < Australia.

      I don’t think Donald Trump would launch an invasion until after the election at the soonest as he is waiting to see if the republican friendly Pierre Poilievre gets elected with a majority government. I hope our fellow voters can see past the Canadian parallel of Viktor Yanukovych.

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Interesting, why do you think blue states - oh. I was reading that backwards. I’m in a blue state. 😬

          • nettle@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Sorry for the late reply and thanks for the question,

            The Australian 2024 national defence strategy says this: “Our Alliance with the US remains fundamental to Australia’s national security. We will continue to deepen and expand our defence engagement with the US, including by pursuing greater scientific, technological and industrial cooperation, as well as enhancing our cooperation under force posture initiatives”

            US has these military facilities in Australia (and more secret ones):

            “Australian Defence Satellite Communications Station – located near Kojarena 30 km east of Geraldton, Western Australia. Other U.S. bases in Australia are present and this list does not include ADF bases with U.S. access. The U.S. military has access to many ADF training areas, northern Australian RAAF airfields, port facilities in Darwin, Fremantle, Stirling naval base in Perth, and the airfield on the Cocos Islands in the Indian Ocean.” Wikipedia

            US also has a Rotational U.S. Army, Navy Presence where they bring their submarines and provide financial benefits to many military services they can use (RAAF bases and the assisting in manufacturing of missiles and other weapons). There are 2500 US marines on permanent rotation

            According to US gov “The United States is Australia’s defense goods and services partner of choice” and “The U.S. has over $27 billion in active government-to-government sales cases with Australia” most of Australias military equipment comes from the US including their nuclear submarines

            Also most aggregiously

            “As documented by CIA whistleblower Christopher John Boyce and several authors, including John Pilger,[7][4][6] as well as some Australian politicians,[8] the CIA allegedly backed Governor-General and representative of Queen Elizabeth II in Australia, Kerr, to dismiss Whitlam, due to Whitlam’s perceived left-wing policies[3] including Australian withdrawal from the Vietnam War, as well as his views on Australian sovereignty.[3] His conflict with the CIA is alleged[3] to have come to a head when he discovered several CIA-led operations occurring in Australia and overseas conducted by ASIO and ASIS, leading him to threaten cancellation of the lease on the Pine Gap facility, ending the US-led (nominally joint) operation, which was integral to the CIA’s signals interception operations in the southern hemisphere”

            "In a statement to parliament on 3 April 1974, Whitlam said: “The Australian government takes the attitude that there should not be foreign military bases, stations, installations in Australia.”

            He was then sacked and replaced by a more agreeing pm by the CIA Wikipedia

            There are also numerous traid agreements that leads to Australia relying on US for a lot of its financial security (though it relies on China and Japan as well). And also many Australian companys are US owned/funded

            This is all the research I have time to do but there are many, many more examples of American interference and control.

            Edit: also America controls most of Australian media including News Corp Australia (owns most newspapers and News Corp is also the controlling shareholder of Foxtel and it owns Sky News in Australia. And much more)

            also the American controlled ABC is the most visited site In Australia. And controls a lot of other media

            https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/how-much-influence-does-the-murdoch-media-have-in-australia-20201015-p565dk.html