• Genius
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just because it uses a different mechanism to achieve federation you’re going to say that it doesn’t count as federation? That’s wild.

    No. I’m going to say it doesn’t count as federation because it doesn’t achieve federation.

    Actually, we need some new language to describe what Bluesky is. Federations are geopolitical alliances between equals. But Bluesky instances are centralised, with one relay acting as a truth source for many PDS servers. So to extend the analogy with a hierarchical geopolitical alliance… well that’s an empire. Bluesky is an empire. Bluesky is designed with an imperial mechanism. Bluesky is imperialised. That’s the new word for what Bluesky is.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      You’re being intentionally obstinate. You keep implying that you can’t host your own relay, to which many PDSs (that also link to other relays) can’t link.

      With bluesky, people choose what federations to join by selecting which relays their PDSs will join.

      The analogy of geopolitical federation is cute, but that’s an analogy, it’s not actually what federation is when talking about technology. You seem upset that bluesky achieves federation with a different architecture, and idk why you’d be upset about that, or even care