• cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been inching towards Gnome Web (WebKit) for a while now. Every time I try using it I last a little longer than last time before I encounter some deal breaking issue and return to Firefox.

    In the short term I’m considering sticking to Firefox for work, and using Gnome Web for all other kinds of distractions. I’m writing this in Gnome Web right now, and it’s working great. :)

    On mobile I’ll probably stick to Firefox for a while. So they will still have all my data, and if I have to choose between Mozilla and Google it will still be Mozilla. But my god I wish they would stop acting like idiots.

  • e0qdk@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Yes.

    Short term – I’ll probably be moving to LibreWolf, most likely. I’m planning to spend a good chunk of time this weekend reviewing what exactly their fork does. I’ve read their self-description already – and like it – but I want to look through the code and try to build it myself before I start depending on it.

    Long term – I’ll be keeping my eye on Servo and Ladybird.

  • Fitik@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not yet, they’re still the best option that doesn’t use Chromium (I don’t count Safari), but Servo is looking pretty promising

  • Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve been using Firefox since it was Netscape, and I’m ‘concerned’ but not going anywhere yet.

  • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m going to stick to Firefox for the time being at least for the clients where I managed to get Firefox ESR accepted. For everything else, it might be the time to switch to Librewolf. Among other advantages, they have enabled jxl support.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Librewolf. Mozilla will just keep enshittifying their browser. My biggest hope is that chrome is split off from Google and Mozilla loses their funding from google (500M/year). It’s way more than they need and they refuse to actually compete with Chrome/Chromium. Instead, they are content being the excuse for Google not to be sued for being a monopoly.

    Hopefully the charade will end before Trump leaves office. Either because the US courts force google to split or because the EU finally grows a pair and declares Google and their tech to be a liability. My bet is that a new browser like LadyBird will give Firefox a reason to actually improve, but it’ll be too late.

    Anti Commercial-AI license

  • Sophocles@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I still don’t see Mozilla as a bad actor, especially in comparison with the villany that is google and microsoft. It’s still a great alternative for privacy newbies and average users, although I personally made the switch to librewolf (desktop) and iceraven (mobile) a while ago. Both being forks of firefox, development for actual firefox is essential for either of these to survive, so Mozilla still has my support albeit indirectly

    • zecg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Librewolf / IronFox for me, Mozilla can fuck right off with their cloud services, added value and hunger for telemetry. Their 2% userbase is about to shrink even further.

  • fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I honestly have no clue, personally.

    I know i have to jump ship, but my choices are either chromium, or a fork of firefox, that may be slow to catch up with security / may not last.

    I’ve got my eyes on librewolf, floorp and zen.

    I’m especially watching https://ladybird.org/. A completely independent browser. But the dev has gotten himself in hot water iirc, but anything to get away from google and mozilla, i guess. Also, it’s not complete.

    We’ll see what the future has in stock for us.

  • shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m staying on this side, but probably switching to a fork like Librewolf

    I’ve previously used Floorp which is feature rich but not polished, and same goes for Zen

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    If they’re willing to lose their market share just to chase the AI dragon, I’m willing to be complicit. I know that Brave is pretty good on PC (aware of their crypto bollockery), and I’m taking Librewolf for a spin. As for mobile, I’m happy with Vanadium.

    The real shame is Thunderbird getting caught in it. I’ll have to look for a replacement both on PC and Android.

    • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I use fair mail on Android and I really like it. Evolution comes pre installed on Debian, it got the job done for me too. The mobile client is more important to me personally.

  • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Well, I have been using Zen, a Firefox fork for the past 6 months, and they have yet to clarify their stance on the ToS update.

    Anyway, I don’t think I’ll change anyway, we need Gecko in the browser engine landscape and I have been so used to Firefox’S UI and flexibility that I have a hard time imagining myself not using a Firefox-based browser.

  • Zikeji@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Coincidentally, I just found out about Floorp yesterday, in no relation to this ToS change, and will take a look at it soon. Keep in mind I haven’t looked at all yet, so I have no clue if they have a worse ToS or something.

  • Yozul@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Is there anything in the new ToS that’s even bad? Like, there are lots of people breathlessly ranting about how privacy is dead because Mozilla mentioned the existence of third parties and gibberish like that, but when I read it myself it mostly seemed like they were just saying that if you use third party services through Firefox then the third parties will have your data. That seems kinda like a nothingburger of a controversy to me. I dunno, I’m not a lawyer, maybe I missed something, but if so I certainly haven’t seen anybody else explain it properly.

      • Yozul@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They removed a broadly worded promise that might theoretically be used to get them in trouble for selling anonymized data. I’m not happy about that, but it doesn’t surprise me.

        The rest is just people being angry at Mozilla for describing how a modern web browser works, because other companies have pointed at similar language to argue that they have the right to do whatever they want with any information they collect and no one has stopped them. That sucks, but the problem is that there are no consequences for large corporations, not that Mozilla is using the information you put into your browser to access the internet for you. Maybe Mozilla will also decide to intentionally misinterpret their own legalese to train some garbage AI, but the absolute worst case scenario is that they’re the same as every other significant browser, and a more reasonable interpretation would be that the non-profit organization is probably not profit motivated and actually means the things they say.

        Who knows. I can’t see the future, but without Firefox forks of it are a dead-end, and any other browser is still going to collect a bunch of information and use it to navigate the web for you, because that’s just how today’s garbage javascript laden websites work. Yelling at Mozilla for explaining that in their ToS isn’t going to fix it, and Ladybird isn’t going to magically change how those websites work. If you really want to do something about it, don’t use those websites. Good luck with that.