• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Right but…they did provide it. And now they’re not. You wouldn’t call removing that encryption “breaking”?

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        What does your behavior have to do with whether or not the encryption is broken?

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          Social media doesn’t do nuance.

          No encryption was broken.

          Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection. This is not the case.

          Selling you a box to put your stuff in and selling someone else a locked box to put their stuff in doesn’t mean Apple broke into your box. It means your big brother won’t let you have locks.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Broken would imply that Apple has the ability to decrypt stored user data using advanced data protection.

            …is that not what they’re doing?

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              2 days ago

              No.

              They disabled the ability for new users to use ADP.

              If you use ADP, only you have the encryption keys. The UK wants Apple to keep a copy of the decryption keys.

              There is nothing that can be done to data that is already protected by ADP. At worst Apple can delete it, or turn over encrypted data but there is nothing that is likely to exist in the next 100 years that can break the encryption (even hypothetical quantum computers).

              As an interesting side note, if you use Windows and use Bitlocker to encrypt your hard drives while logged into a Microsoft account then Microsoft backs up your recovery key “for your convenience”. They’ve produced these recovery keys for subpoenas.

              That is what the UK wants Apple to do.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                They disabled the ability for new users to use ADP.

                So existing users can continue using ADP?

                • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Yes, for the moment.

                  “Apple can no longer offer Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the United Kingdom to new users and current UK users will eventually need to disable this security feature,”

                  It’ll eventually be completely removed, but they seem to have some time to be in compliance and so they’ll give their customers time to move before it’s all deleted.

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lemmy is not encrypted, my comments are public, your comments are public, we both know that. Anyone with a raspberry pi or an old netbook can scrape them.

          If I use an encrypted service and all of a sudden everything that I thought was encrypted was decrypted by the service provider without my consent? That’s breaking encryption.

          If on the other hand I use an encrypted service and they tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data because of privacy invading government policies? That is not breaking encryption.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data

            Oh that makes much more sense.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      No.
      Users that do not decrypt their storage lose their storage permanently.
      Users that decrypt their storage get to continue to use it, but it isn’t not encrypted.

      No encryption is broken.
      Users are swapping convenience for privacy. (Or privacy for convenience? Whichever way that is).

      Broken implies it is unusable or useless. As in “Apples encryption is unusable”.
      This is not the case. It’s not broken. Users are given the option to remove the encryption to be able to continue to use the storage.

      Essentially: https://xkcd.com/538/

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I always see that one and think “goddamn they’d kill me because I’d never remember the password after the drugs hit, and the more they hit me the less I’ll be able to focus and remember”

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not as it is conventionally used.

      If you break a lock, that’s different from unlocking it and removing it.