• Realitaetsverlust
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not sure what you’re trying to say. Uyghurs are systematically eradicated and tibet is controlled by china since their invasion in the 1950s. Not exactly speaking in favor of communism.

    So, if you’d like to expand on your point, I might be able to discuss this further.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      eradicated LOL, their population is growing, despite the many some US backed terrorist killed.
      And Tibet doesn’t have slaves anymore who literally had chains around their necks suffering under the religious buddhist monks terror.
      Yawn, can you bring up Tiananmen square again to not be original? I’ll wait

      • Realitaetsverlust
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        eradicated LOL, their population is growing

        According to who? The chinese government? Lmao. Ye I would DEFINITELY trust the ones that are performing the killings on reporting accurate numbers.

        And Tibet doesn’t have slaves anymore who literally had chains around their necks suffering under the religious buddhist monks terror.

        Imperialism good when country does bad things?

        Yawn, can you bring up Tiananmen square again to not be original? I’ll wait

        I could, but if you want some originality, I can also bring up one of the other atrocities directly ordered by communist regimes, like the Prague Spring, Hungarian Revolution or the mass executions by the Khmer in Cambodia.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t need to prove something that didn’t happen which isn’t possible, you show me proof of your fantasy eradication that isn’t from the sick nutbag Adrian Zenz. Must be easy if it’s such a genocide.

          Imperialism good when country does bad things?

          Hypocrisy good in the name of bringing democracy.

        • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 hours ago

          oh, the khmer rouge, that one that the u.s. supported along with britain, china (not so dirty back then, right) and who were toppled by the socialist regime of vietnam?

          • Realitaetsverlust
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I already answered that to someone else so I’ll just copy and paste it:

            The US never directly supported pol pot. Before 1975, they supported Lon Nol, who was fighting against the communist Khmer Rouge.

            The part that IS true is that the US did support China and Thailand at the time, which in turn used that aid to support resistance groups in cambodia because vietnam invaded cambodia in 1979 - something the US had no problem with since vietnam was backed by the soviets. Also, it is true that the US and other western countries supported keeping the Khmer Rouge as Cambodia’s official UN representative, however, that was mostly done to undermine Vietnam’s rule over cambodia.

            So, yes, by extension, the US supported pol pot, but it’s not the big “gotcha” you think it is - it was the cold war, an extremely complex geopolitical time.

    • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Lol I meant to reply to the main thread, but you could pretend im being sarcastic and it kinda works