Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoHexadecimalslrpnk.netimagemessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageHexadecimalslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square128fedilink
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down4·2 days agoits the capital city of China :D you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-22 days agooh… sorry, you are right. but you will get the same result.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·2 days agoYou think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 days agoYou know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·2 days agoWhy would I do that when the Internet will correct me? Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
minus-squareKusimulkku@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoIt was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
minus-squareTempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoWell shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoOh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
minus-square𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days agoThat would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
minus-squaremacniel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days agoMy life is a lie :o Thanks for the correction.
its the capital city of China :D
you know, where something happend on a specific square in the specific year of 1984.
You missed the g.
oh… sorry, you are right.
but you will get the same result.
You think DeepSeek won’t talk about one of the largest cities in the world?
You know, you could’ve just tested it yourself lol
Why would I do that when the Internet will correct me?
Seems like a really weird line to draw. I guess they got bored of people trying to trick it into talking about Tianamen?
It was just funny the way you dismissed the claim without testing it yourself. But it’s almost too silly to be true
Well shit. I thought it was BS too. But damn if it didn’t abort after a little deep thinking on the Olympics.
Oh it does… but then it will remove everything and states that it’s out of scope.
That would be 4 june 1989, not 9 june 1984 sir ;)
My life is a lie :o
Thanks for the correction.