I’m not a mobile app developer so I’m a bit confused. Why would every class need to refer the app name? Isn’t it enough of the pom file (or whatever the equivalent is that has to package the app) knows it?
Android apps are written in Kotlin or Java and this means every file will be per convention under com.company.appname(or similar)
And every file will have a line
package com.company.appname
And references to other files in the import.
This means every source code file is changed and therfore recompiled and the update will include the whole app.
Now 35GB means there is a lot of image and/or Audio resources also included. Why this is updated as well I don’t know, but their path also changed. Maybe that’s enough for the Version control to see it as new.
Assuming a language like Java: It’s possible that the app name is included in the name of packages, so referencing packages other than the current one would need the app name. See the constant pool.
But that falls into the “bad programmer” someone else mentioned. Developers should have internal code names that are independent of marketing stuff like the name of the app.
I’m not a mobile app developer so I’m a bit confused. Why would every class need to refer the app name? Isn’t it enough of the pom file (or whatever the equivalent is that has to package the app) knows it?
Android apps are written in Kotlin or Java and this means every file will be per convention under com.company.appname(or similar)
And every file will have a line
package com.company.appnameAnd references to other files in the import.
This means every source code file is changed and therfore recompiled and the update will include the whole app.
Now 35GB means there is a lot of image and/or Audio resources also included. Why this is updated as well I don’t know, but their path also changed. Maybe that’s enough for the Version control to see it as new.
And that’s why you use a separate codename for actual software development. Changing the visible app name should only affect a few resource files.
In those cases, I would leave the internal naming alone. It’s not uncommon for software to have a different name internally than externally.
Not if you’re a garbage developer.
Assuming a language like Java: It’s possible that the app name is included in the name of packages, so referencing packages other than the current one would need the app name. See the constant pool.
But that falls into the “bad programmer” someone else mentioned. Developers should have internal code names that are independent of marketing stuff like the name of the app.