Trump installed three conservative justices, tilting the court 6-3 to the right, which delivered significant victories for conservatives

Joe Biden worries that the “extreme” US supreme court, dominated by rightwing justices, cannot be relied upon to uphold the rule of law.

“I worry,” the president told ProPublica in interview published on Sunday. “Because I know that if the other team, the Maga Republicans, win, they don’t want to uphold the rule of law.”

“Maga” is shorthand for “Make America great again”, Donald Trump’s campaign slogan. Trump faces 91 criminal charges and assorted civil threats but nonetheless dominates Republican polling for the nomination to face Biden in a presidential rematch next year.

In four years in the White House, Trump nominated and saw installed three conservative justices, tilting the court 6-3 to the right. That court has delivered significant victories for conservatives, including the removal of the right to abortion and major rulings on gun control, affirmative action and other issues.

The new court term, which starts on Tuesday, could see further such rulings on matters including government environmental and financial regulation.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldEnglish
          56·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know the details, from what I understand FDR was contemplating the same thing, so it does seem like the power to do this is an electoral branch power and not in the legislative branch.

          But I honestly don’t know the details so I could be wrong, its just something I heard of before.

          • jasory@programming.dev
            93·
            1 year ago

            “so it does seem like the power to do this is electoral branch power and not in the legislative branch”

            Quite poor evidence for your conclusion. FDR tried to pass legislation to expand the SCOTUS, and was interpreted as trying to manipulate the court by his own party, which is why it was blocked.

            Court expansion has always been done by Congress, it’s interpreted as an extension of it’s power to create courts.

            • Zaktor@sopuli.xyzEnglish
              3·
              1 year ago

              Quite poor evidence for your conclusion. FDR tried to pass legislation to expand the SCOTUS, and was interpreted as trying to manipulate the court by his own party, which is why it was blocked.

              It was blocked after the judges flipped and started approving his programs. It was expected to pass up until that point.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.worldEnglish
              32·
              1 year ago

              Quite poor evidence for your conclusion. FDR tried to pass legislation to expand the SCOTUS, and was interpreted as trying to manipulate the court by his own party, which is why it was blocked.

              Fair enough. Just a friendly reminder…

              But I honestly don’t know the details so I could be wrong, its just something I heard of before.

              It was an off-the-cuff comment and I mentioned in the comment I could be wrong and that I was not certain, so, /shrug.