• Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    (but then why is Tixati in B, seems to have mostly downsides?)

    You need to read it again more carefully. Lightweight, highly customisable and feature-rich is why it is that high.

    • garyyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess I just don’t really know what feature-rich means in this context but being proprietary, not fully cross platform, and banned on most private trackers seems like huge downsides for power users compared to customization, built in search, and integrated chat.

      I get this chart probably not made for people like me in mind though.

        • ram@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          special sauce they cooked it with let’s it run on the trashheap of a computer

          It’s called coding in VS C++ and using native Windows controls, a dying art form unfortunately. The price is losing cross-platform compatibility.

      • uranibaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Feature-rich

        To be able to set download location, not download into folders, change location based on category, stop seeding after ratio or time, watch a folder for torrent files, delete said files after importing them, minimize to tray.

        Not sure what transmission can and cannot do, but those are some examples of features in this context. Others may have a different opinion.