• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m being loose with terminology, I apologize. I mean the specific microarchitecture, as in the specific implementation of the instruction set. Just like photocopying an entire book goes beyond fair use, so could duplicating the microarchitecture verbatim.

    I don’t know the case law here (not a lawyer), but I think ISAs can’t be copyrighted because they’re an API (which is similar to Google vs Oracle), but I could see Nintendo having a case if they’re duplicating the microarchitecture directly. Emulators are fine because they’re doing a clean room implementation of the ISA, but directly pulling the gates from the chips could go a step too far and constitute a derivative work.

    • ChronosWing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Nintendo was going to do something they would of done it years ago when analogue released a Nes, Snes, and Gameboy FPGA console.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you look at Nintendo’s lawsuits, they’re mostly centered around their video game IPs. They’ll target ROM sites, streamers playing their games, and modders. Sometimes they’ll go after emulators of modern consoles, but only if it’s an open and shut case.

        That doesn’t mean Nintendo can’t or won’t go after them, it just means they haven’t. I wouldn’t feel comfortable running or investing in a company like this without Nintendo approval in writing.