• FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do you need physical access to employees that don’t do their work on time or up to quality?

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Training and education have been found to occur better in person than online.

        If someone needs help, shouldn’t they be given the best chance at success?

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m going to want a citation on that. I learn just fine on my own, and I’m sure many others do too. If you’re really concerned about giving people “the best chance at success” rather than just forcing them into boxes then you’d be presenting options.

          • Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            it probably has to do with the quality of “remote training” materials. my company (contract security), I train new hires in a variety of things including CPR/AED/First Aid… you can definitely tell the difference between people who were given the stupid web-cartoon training vs actual in person training.

            hell, the remote training shit had terrible localization issues. (as in, would get our people arrested and charged with felonies… ooops…)

    • Honytawk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is requiring all employees to spend multiple unpaid hours in a car during rush hour in order to put them in unattractive cubicals or desks akin to prison cells, where they are only allowed to shit x amounts a day, and where the manager keep looking over the shoulder to see if you are not wasting a minute thinking about anything other than work a punishment?

      What do you think?