Image transcription: a section of a Wikipedia article titled “Relationship with Reality”. It reads “From a scientific viewpoint, elves are not considered objectively real. [3] However,” End transcription.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 年前

      Wow, they really dance around that. The belief in elves is real, champ, not the elves themselves due to that belief. This isn’t a Terry Pratchett novel.

      • dreadgoat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 年前

        It’s written that way to be as neutral as possible.

        Replace “Elf” with “God” and you’ll see how important it is to “dance”

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 年前

            What a thing to say. It’s perfectly reasonable to say that there’s insufficient evidence to believe in any gods, but to state that there is no god as a matter of fact is as presumptive as saying that there objectively is.

            • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 年前

              God doesn’t exist. The tooth fairy doesn’t exist. Elvis Presley is dead. If you want to believe there is a possibility for any of these statements to be false, you have a questionable relationship with reality.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                edit-2
                1 年前

                There is evidence to suggest that the tooth fairy isn’t real–when tested, magic has consistently been shown to not exist. The only intangible forces that have been shown to act on things are gravity, electromagnetism, and the nuclear forces, none of which allows for teeth to turn into quarters. On top of that, most parents will admit that they made the tooth fairy up. It’s reasonable to say that there is objectively no tooth fairy because there’s evidence to suggest it can’t exist.

                There is evidence to suggest that Elvis Presley is dead. Here’s a transcript of the medical examiner’s report listing the likely cause of death as H.C.V.D. associated with ASHD. He would be 88 today, which, considering his lifestyle, would be an impressive age to reach without dying. It’s reasonable to say that Elvis is definitely dead, because there’s evidence to suggest he can’t be alive.

                There is no such evidence to suggest that there can’t be a creator deity. I don’t believe that there is, but I won’t make a truth claim without evidence. If you wanna say that the Christian god isn’t real, that’s fine. There are contradictions in their holy text that show that the god in their book cannot exist. But to say that no god can exist is a truth statement that lacks evidence. Saying it just makes you look like an edgy teenager who just figured out that they’re atheist. Makes you look like a fan of thunderf00t or Carl of Akkad.

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 年前

              I love how nobody is responding to you, because the truth is: we can’t know, but most of us are very sure whether there is a god either way. It’s nonsense to call what an atheist believes absolutely “true,” because we can’t know. I’m an atheist, but it’s just pseudoscience to suggest that we can scientifically prove that there’s no god.

              • Nash42@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 年前

                Agreed and well-put. Lack of evidence cannot give creedence to a claim. It’s all well and good to believe in (the absence of, or possibility of) supernatural being(s), but to state such beliefs as objective is not follow the scientific method.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 年前

                Where enough people have believed in the reality of elves that those beliefs then had real effects in the world, they can be understood as part of people’s worldview, and as a social reality: a thing which, like the exchange value of a dollar bill or the sense of pride stirred up by a national flag, is real because of people’s beliefs rather than as an objective reality. Accordingly, beliefs about elves and their social functions have varied over time and space.

                There are a few crusades and jihads that point towards gods being just as meaningfully real to us as dollar values and national pride

                  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 年前

                    Same goes with trading a dollar bill for goods and services. That dollar doesn’t have legitimate inherent value, but it can manifest change in the world via the people that believe it does. Same goes with pride in your country/city/state/province when you see your region’s flag. It isn’t physically real, but the wiki never claimed that it is.