Although the Supreme Court struck down President Joe Biden’s signature student loan forgiveness program in late June, his administration has found ways to cancel more than $48 billion in debt since then.

The cancellations have come through existing federal student loan forgiveness programs, which are limited to specific categories of borrowers, such as public-sector workers, people defrauded by for-profit colleges, and borrowers who have paid for at least 20 years.

These programs are separate from the rejected forgiveness plan, which would have canceled about $430 billion of the $1.6 trillion of outstanding federal student loan debt all at one time.

The Biden administration has been granting student loan forgiveness through these existing programs on a rolling basis since coming into office and has discharged a total of $127 billion for nearly 3.6 million people to date.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s cancelled student debt for a precious few, unilaterally, several times.

    I’m not sure why we’re pretending he needs Congress or SCOTUS, except that a lot of people just want to pretend he’s magically powerless to fulfill his campaign promises.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not pretending, you moron. He already tried forgiving student loan debt through executive orders and the courts blocked him.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        He doesn’t need the courts.

        He’s unilaterally done this multiple times.

        Please stop lying to yourself.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Learn how the government works before you make a fool of yourself again, you ignorant child.

            • Honytawk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Still, rather an oppressor that at least tries to help than one that doesn’t even do that.

              • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                at least tries to help

                What you call ‘at least tries to help’ seems to be rather performative to me.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The executive doesn’t have limitless power, regardless of what various bell-ends on Lemmy seem to believe. And if you think that it should, I’d caution you to do a brief thought experiment and imagine what things will be like when someone with whom you disagree occupies the same office.